Re: Distributors and advance curves - how many did Packard build?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Kev, No worries, I'm not suggesting more work for you, just an idea for a dedicated thread for posting modification tips like custom distributor curves, PCV systems, and other tips and techniques for improved performance, economy, reliability, emissions, appearance etc. Not radical mods but driveability, comfort and appearance things that enhance motoring pleasure. The "REQUEST" thread on the Modified board would be a possible venue, but, being a V8 head, I'd of course like one just for the V8's if possible. Lots of people have great ideas and other people have practical ways to make them work. I don't know how to (or even if I could) move a thread wholesale, but I've done a cut 'n' paste on my PCV thread, to put it on the "Modified' board in the "Request" thread. If you can move that over "officially," and maybe somer other "transplants," I think it would be a promising start on this resource. Thanks for all your good work, Kev. Long live V8 PACKARDS! (and their predecessors too, of course).
Posted on: 2010/9/6 17:27
|
|||
Guy
[b]Not an Expert[/ |
||||
|
Re: Distributors and advance curves - how many did Packard build?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
JP Thanks for the continued updates on this thread. A very good learning tool. Your mileage of around 13 MPG US is very close to the long-term experience we had with three differnt '55 Packards, two Clippers with 352 ci, and one 400 with 352 ci. The things was, they all did about the same, whether you drove them 55 or 85 they came in with about 13 mpg. These engines were apparently engineered to increase greatly in efficiency with RPM increase, offsetting the normal wind and rolling resistances of higher speed driving. 13 was pretty good mileage if you wanted to drive 80 or 90 mph, not so great if you wanted to drive for "economy." They were supposed to be high-speed cruisers, I suspect. The 400 had the heads shaved a full 1/8"-- that's right, .125. A radical experiement, but it improved performance greatly... although it made little difference in mileage. Higher compression apparently is not the key with these beasts, when it comes to mileage, but it sure seems to boost hp and torque (never had any dino tests, but you could sure notice it on the road--even with the twin ultra, it'd snap your head back when it dropped into passing gear). I would guess that your 20 MPG figures are due in great part to the Pertronix system. Curious if you have mileage figures prior to that modification. The fact that there is an electronic ignition system on this car means that it's likely that those with standard ignition systems will experience different results with the same distributor curves you are experimenting with. Thanks again, Mate.
Posted on: 2010/9/6 17:42
|
|||
Guy
[b]Not an Expert[/ |
||||
|
Re: Distributors and advance curves - how many did Packard build?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
For whatever the information is worth, I had driven my 56 Caribbean about 6000 miles with conventional stock ignition and about the same # of miles after putting in Pertronix. Gas mileage did not change as a result, about 14.4 or so at Interstate speeds. This probably relates to about 16 mpg or close to it on pre-ethanol gasoline.
Posted on: 2010/9/6 18:56
|
|||
|