Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
164 user(s) are online (101 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 164

more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




359 Pistons in a 356
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

johntrhodes81
See User information
Does anyone know if 359 pistons will fit in a 356, if bored out? The pin height and rods will be the issue to getting the 359 pistons to fit on the 356 connecting rods. Has anyone tried this?

Thanks,
John R.

Posted on: 2012/9/4 8:43
John Rhodes

1953 Packard Patrician
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 359 Pistons in a 356
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home

Tim Cole
See User information
Dear John:

Not possible. The 359 bore is almost 1/8 inch larger (if my numbers are correct). The service limit is .045.

Posted on: 2012/9/4 10:29
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 359 Pistons in a 356
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home

JWL
See User information
Bore size of a 356 is 3 1/2", and 3 9/16" for a 359.

(o[]o)

Posted on: 2012/9/4 13:40
We move toward
And make happen
What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer)
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 359 Pistons in a 356
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

Tim Cole
See User information
I guess the number I was looking at was for a .040 over piston which is closing in on 1/8 of an inch.

Posted on: 2012/9/4 16:57
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 359 Pistons in a 356
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

johntrhodes81
See User information
The 359 cylinders are 1/16" bigger than the 356, 3 1/2" vs 3 9/16". The 356 has the same cylinder spacing and can use the same head as a 359 (and others) so is the casting that much weaker on a 356 that you couldn't bore it a 1/16" over and use 359 pistons? I guess the water jacket could be closer or oil passages.

John R.

Posted on: 2012/9/5 8:04
John Rhodes

1953 Packard Patrician
 Top  Print   
 








Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved