Re: "53 Clipper
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
|
OK, I need to update my profile from 288 to 327. Thanks. Now the big question...should I go ahead and pick up the 300 for the motor and transmission? It sounds like if I do, it'll be cost saving. I think I've already made up my mind, just looking for some encouragement, from those who know!
Posted on: 2008/9/14 18:50
|
|||
|
Re: "53 Clipper
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
|
What I was wondering on the brakes was, which would be less costly to restore and in my case less complicated, easomatic or standard. The hydraulic unit from my Clipper was in the trunk buried in a mouse nest in the spare tire well.
Posted on: 2008/9/14 19:07
|
|||
|
Re: "53 Clipper
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I think the big questions would be are you looking at just a driver or are you into matching numbers and authenticity. Another question would the condition of the 51 mechanicals. Aside from looking good, what kind of condition is the engine and trans actually in.
Don't recall whether you said standard or Ultramatic transmission, but Ultra trans had some significant mechanical improvements in 52 forward in the direct drive clutch and valving which might make you want to use the 53 if Ultra is what you have. Don't recall much in changes to engines other than carbs. Edit: Brakes as to less hassle and ease, then standard. If you do use the Treadlevac, then by all means have it properly checked and rebuilt. Again, there is a great deal of difference of opinion as to reliability on that unit. They were used by many cars for many years without difficulty but they have to be in good condition. Others have had experiences where there was sudden failure.
Posted on: 2008/9/14 19:10
|
|||
|
Re: "53 Clipper
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
|
Mine has a automatic (the 300 does too). As far as matching numbers, I know that's not going to happen. I'll just be happy having a driver!
Good point on the condition of the parts. Aside from the fact that they're there I don't know. We didn't have time to see if the motor was free...I'll go back and check. I didn't take anything off the engine because I wasn't sure if the parts were interchangable. I figured the standard brakes would be easier. Know that I know they are for sure, I'm going to see which will be cheaper. Buying the parts singlely or the whole car.
Posted on: 2008/9/14 19:48
|
|||
|
Re: "53 Clipper
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
|
Thanks again for the info and suggestions. It's been educational and enjoyable.
Posted on: 2008/9/14 20:03
|
|||
|
Re: "53 Clipper
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
If you had the 9 main L6, then there would be mechanical fit issues. What issues would there be? All the '51-'54 engines are externally the same. Also, if you can get a manual trans setup for one of these cars, then use it over the Ultra, it'll be cheaper in the long run. And, I'd personally go with manual brakes over the Easamatic. Also, cheaper and better in the long run.
Posted on: 2008/9/14 22:45
|
|||
|
Re: "53 Clipper
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
You're right. Aside from slightly heavier, no major difference on those engines. I still had the 356 on my pea brain when responding. Do believe I mentioned elsewhere having only a dozen or so active brain cells at one time.
Posted on: 2008/9/15 9:22
|
|||
|