Re: Why isn't Bendix TV as sensitive as it used to be?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Anyone know if the diameter or length of the hydraulic ram or the cylinder portion was the same over the years? A slight difference in either would affect the feel. Just wondering if they might have played around with changes in that area along with the power unit with the P-1, 2, 3, 4, designations. If a new ram or cylinder was installed during a rebuild that might explain a difference.
Posted on: 2016/7/7 12:46
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: Why isn't Bendix TV as sensitive as it used to be?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The diameter of the ram could certainly affect the sensitivity.
But length of ram nor size of chamber would have any affect at all.
Posted on: 2016/7/7 14:54
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: Why isn't Bendix TV as sensitive as it used to be?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The diameter of all the components stayed the same, so no change in the potential force created by the vacuum, thus the hydraulic pressure by the piston.
Posted on: 2016/7/7 15:28
|
|||
|