Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Which two had the rear seat speakers?
Posted on: 2010/2/18 14:58
|
|||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Which two had the rear seat speakers?
According to the TPC article, #s 1019 and 1197. I'd very much like to see the installation because it isn't particularly obvious from looking at the rear compartment just how it would have been accomplished in the convertible.
Posted on: 2010/2/18 15:02
|
|||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The build sheets do not specify which radio was ordered but the price sheet group code for RUA is Radio, Three-way tuning with Twin Rear Antenna and Rear speaker
All Packard models (except Caribbean Models) 129.00 168.00 Caribbean models (Less Rear speaker on 5699) Standard Clipper Line Not Available
Posted on: 2010/2/18 16:14
|
|||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I certainly can't add anything more by way of an explanation, except to say the source data used for that article was, according to the author, provided by yourself.
Posted on: 2010/2/18 16:36
|
|||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Which issue TPC is that in I did not retype the data for the article that was done by someone else and may be a typo
Posted on: 2010/2/18 17:06
|
|||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I looked recently at a very late Clipper Deluxe, approx within the last 135 or so made...it's number was 5640 5580, with the last Deluxe recorded being 5640 5715 according to Dawes, so I'd surmise it was built in June, and perhaps in the last week or 2 before the end on June 25...were a mix of models run most days, or did they tend to be made in batches? Be interesting to pinpoint the build date on one so late.
Posted on: 2010/2/18 17:14
|
|||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
No. 48, Autumn 1987. It does say the raw data came from you, but it does indeed cite another individual who edited it for presentation so perhaps there was a typo. If so, it would be very important to those of us who use that data and accept it at face value to have the error come forward and be corrected. We'd all appreciate your making whatever corrections are needed.
Posted on: 2010/2/18 17:20
|
|||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
FYI:
Re: 5699 1269. From Packards International Magazine SUmmer 96, vol 33 #2: "...built on the last thrursday that packard built cars, June 21 1956." NOTE that the article erroneously states the VN as 2699-1269 and not 5699-1269. It is a paragragh containing the above information on page 27 that at one time lead me to believe that all Convertibles were built LATE 56. As Owen has indicated a few months ago in another thread, my belief was false. Either way, the publication above was an issue mostly deedicated to Caribs. Worth haveing for Carib fanciers.
Posted on: 2010/2/18 18:10
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: '56 V8 production vs serial #s
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Also in the same publication on page 23 indicates "the very last Carib" in white/orange. Owned by an unamed Dr here in Tn. No other info given about the car. And the article/pics are somewhat confusing the way they are layed out. Good mag issue to have tho.
I saw this car back in 87 prior to any personal Packard ownership of my own.
Posted on: 2010/2/18 18:16
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|