Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
211 user(s) are online (120 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 209

HH56, classiclincoln, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2)

Re: Math question
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

Craig Hendrickson
See User information
HH56 wrote Quote:
Another thought: Is there anything in the method or geometry of moving long lever that could change the ratio. I can't see it and am going under the assumption that as long as the lever connect point is at the distance to provide a given ratio, it doesn't matter what the shape of connection piece to pedal is. Currently instead of straight across, I have an "L" shaped piece between pedal and lever.(snip)


There would be no difference in the (parallel) plane of motion. Of course, if the lever mechanism is not strong enough, then the lever could twist or bend and that could change the ratio depending upon where the deflection occured.

Craig

Posted on: 2011/3/9 14:07
Nuke them from orbit, it's the only way to be sure! Ellen Ripley "Aliens"
Time flies like an arrow. Frui
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Math question
#12
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
Thanks, Craig. I didn't think so either but was throwing it out to see if I overlooked something that was obvious to everyone else.

I am concerned about flex as well so have made it very beefy. Probably way more than needed but will most likely keep it that way. Final design and dimensions still in progress but makes it so much nicer done this way instead of having a straight across rod as was in one of my early pictures.

Posted on: 2011/3/9 14:27
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Math question
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Flex???? Just use any modern car/lite truck (of equal size) that u already own to compare dimensions of material used. Should not have to go any heavier than that.

NOTE that the F Explorer pedal assembly i'm using had thin nylon bushings in the pedal hinge which seems skimpy to me but it holds up just fine.

Use any modern or even not so modern production vehicle as a model for materials needs and applications. How could anyone go wrong with that????

Posted on: 2011/3/9 21:29
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Math question
#14
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
Just use any modern car/lite truck (of equal size) that u already own to compare dimensions of material used

You're right, but I'd rather err on the overkill side and also need some thickness in that piece for the bearing I'm using. Another benefit is to keep the different metal sizes needed to just a few pieces.

Am not saying this is the best or only way. Assuming the possible bleed problem is solved and actually get some numbers that are reasonable, will photograph and provide details and measurements of what was done. If anyone else wants to try one, this will be a starting point and any changes can be made they feel appropriate or more comfortable with.

I'm still not sure about the nearness of shift linkage, but have decided to go with what I have. The Ultra rod looks like it will clear barely but could be bent if needed. The stick maybe a lost cause without having one to look at in detail.

Posted on: 2011/3/9 22:23
Howard
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2)




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved