Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
150 user(s) are online (108 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 148

53pc, chevyboy, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal

Forum Index


Board index » All Posts (Howard)




Re: Light Bulb Designation, Vendors that Sell
#31
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
Quote:
With the rears already wired from the brake light switch, the added turn signals used the same filaments as the brake lights.

Don, From what I can see in the wiring diagrams not quite the case until the 23rd series. I cannot see any evidence of rear factory turn signal wires in 41 diagrams but they do show the ready to use wired fronts. For 42 in the 20th series all models diagram they do show a factory T. S. install on a senior car and it is the same as Clippers thru 47. The 48 22nd series with the exception of the panel indicator is the same. 42-7 had R & L indicators while 48s only had a single indicator bulb.

All prewar thru 48 cars with tail and brake light housings on both sides had the dual contact bulbs wired the same --small and large filaments in parallel each fed from a single switch and power wire. With the basic 3 wire switch for turn signals, because the large filaments in the tail light bulbs were already in parallel and used for the brake lights, the two functions could not be easily separated or shared because as soon as brake were applied and lights were on, the bulbs would not turn off when flashing was needed. An extra bulb was added in the rear to accommodate the turn signal.

Adding an LED bulb would not be an issue for the brake and tail light but like the other models I suspect a 6v electronic flasher would be the easiest option when adding them for turn signals. Downside to changing the flasher is the original mounting method and terminals would need to be changed for the new flasher. It appears LEDLight.com has the bulbs and flasher needed including the 1129 single contact rear bulb.

Here is the basic turn signal, brake and tail light circuits used thru 48. The main difference is in the indicator lights. 42-7 used two indicators and as the Clipper extraction shows those are handled differently than the single bulb in 48. I suspect if turn signals were added to 40 or 41 models they would have had a different tail light housing for the second bulb and probably ran a couple of extra wires or loom under the car much like the reverse light option. No idea how they handled the dash indictor but there might have been a spot in the 41 dash overlay to add one.

Attach file:



jpg  48 22nd series turn signal, brake and tail light.jpg (176.90 KB)
209_661ab33d262fb.jpg 1300X1295 px

jpg  42-7 Clipper turn signal extraction.jpg (153.64 KB)
209_661ab43b9d014.jpg 1169X1295 px

Posted on: 4/13 11:35
Howard
 Top 


Re: 1937 120 Conv. Sedan - Blanche
#32
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
Quote:
With the sealed beams, I guess the Park lights up front are hidden until I add as fog lights or something?

If this is the car where the original parking light bulb and location inside the enclosure was converted to accommodate turn signals I am curious how those bulbs are able to be seen or how mounting was done and still let you have a sealed beam conversion. Are your sealed beams the original type 7" diameter bulb used in that era which fills the entire surface of the housing?

Posted on: 4/12 19:32
Howard
 Top 


Re: LED brake light/turn signal bar
#33
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
Has anyone with the two bulb tail light housings which use the separate turn signal bulb switched to LEDs? If so was it a noticeable improvement? 41-2 conventional and the Clipper based cars thru 22nd series used this two bulb arrangement. While the single LED bulb in the 23rd series housing doing both functions is quite nice, am curious on earlier cars with the dual bulbs if the turn signal flashing above the brake light could still be seen very well if the much brighter brake light was on. With incandescent bulbs the turn signal is visible in daylight but IMO, a bit weak.

The photo is of a Clipper thru 22nd series car with the horizontal split housing and shared lens.
Click to see original Image in a new window

Posted on: 4/12 10:46
Howard
 Top 


Re: Packard takes a swim
#34
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
Quote:
I can back up both my cars under power with the parking brake on, but I can't get either to move forward under power with it on.

Very much too bad. Assuming he did set the emergency brake, maybe he needs to follow the procedure Ross suggests when adjusting his brakes. I think the one on Amelia island was an earlier model. Either it rolled off a trailer or was parked on an incline but it did find a lake.

As to being able to move with emergency brake on in reverse, that describes perfectly the joys of the self energizing Bendix brake system. One of the selling points Packard mentioned is forward rotation causes the primary shoe to rotate slightly pushing the secondary hard against the anchor and causing it to wedge against the drum more tightly thus increasing braking force. You would think it would work in the opposite direction with the primary shoe against the anchor and wedging the drum but I can assure you it does not.

Let me just say you have not had excitement in your life until you are riding in a car with a BTV and engine stalls while you are out for a leisurely drive going up a mountain road. A friend was driving and when the engine quit and car started rolling back he was pushing with all his might -- literally standing on the pedal and he was not a small man. The car barely slowed down as it rolled backwards. If there had not been a mountain on one side he could steer into I have no doubts we would have quickly seen the bottom of a canyon up close.

Posted on: 4/11 15:49
Howard
 Top 


Re: Light Bulb Designation, Vendors that Sell
#35
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
Quote:

Packard Don wrote:
Quote:
The 23rd series 49-50 cars were the first Packards to share the same rear bulb filament for brakes and turnsignals.


All my 1940 Packard 110s and 1941 Henney-Packard 120 used the same element for turn signals and brake light. Granted that turn signals did not come with the 1940 but it was fully wired for it both front and rear so the front fender lights were also dual element.


Front park and turn signal did share the same bulb but used separate filaments. Power from either the turn signal sw or parking light could go to the same bulb. The 40 and 41 wiring diagrams show the wires to the large filament taped off but present for further use.

Prewar factory turn signal installs used the same 3 wire turn signal switch as did models thru the 22nd series. That switch is simply a single pole double throw switch so has no provision for separating voltage coming from the turn signal sw or the brake light sw. With brakes applied and both rear bulb filaments in parallel, if the turn signal was trying to flash one side, the solid on brake light power would take precedence and light both bulbs so flashing would not be seen. A separate bulb is needed in the rear for turn signals in cars thru the 22nd series and there are one and two bulb housings -- at least for the Clippers and 22nd series. Wiring shows senior 41 models might have the rear turn signal wire provision and there are different housings listed but my wire diagram is too poor a quality to follow path and see where the wires end.

In the 23rd series they went to a 6 wire switch which was the same one used thru 54. When you move the lever on that switch, turn signal flasher is connected to both front and rear bulbs which start flashing while the brake light is disconnected from the side that needs to flash and is sent only to the other side thus lighting a single bulb. By disconnecting the brake light signal a single filament can be shared.

Attach file:



jpg  41-48 turn signal sw3a.jpg (1,433.78 KB)
209_661846af27e86.jpg 2966X2892 px

jpg  49-54 turn signal switch.jpg (160.50 KB)
209_661846edd1b63.jpg 600X500 px

Posted on: 4/11 15:24
Howard
 Top 


Re: KPack's 1954 Panama
#36
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
Just my , I think if you wind up needing to repair it again drilling a couple of holes in the flat wide surface of the clip will let some of the JB Weld squeeze thru the holes and sort of lock the clip to the ring. Clip would be able to take more shear or pull force which is kind of what the clip needs to withstand.

Posted on: 4/11 10:23
Howard
 Top 


Re: Light Bulb Designation, Vendors that Sell
#37
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
There is an older thread which has info on 23rd series bulb or tail light housing removal. It might give you some information because for things like that Chiltons and Motors manuals are not much help.

As to the brake lights not working, almost all the issues others have had seem to have been due to a failed brake light switch so you might start there. The switch is located at the end of the master cylinder and is powered at all times from a circuit breaker on the back of the instrument cluster.

The 23rd series 49-50 cars were the first Packards to share the same rear bulb filament for brakes and turnsignals. If you have turn signals that work then the brake switch is most likely at fault but since the wire from the brake switch goes thru the turn signal switch it could also be a bad or dirty contact in that switch or in the round plug between the loom and short bunch of wires coming out of the steering column right under the dash edge. Bad grounds caused by rust on the body sheetmetal or corrosion in the pot metal housing where the mounting studs make electrical contact with the body and housing are well known issues on almost all postwar Packards.

On the 1154 and 1158 bulbs, if you look at the details they both have the same 3-21 candlepower rating but numbers are reversed so I suspect the difference must be how the side pins are positioned to orient the bulbs in the socket.

Posted on: 4/10 20:31
Howard
 Top 


Re: hph's 400
#38
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
Except for the front fender pieces and I think the little piece next to the side light the stainless "Reynolds wrap" is mostly held by being sort of clamped between the body and the upper and lower side strips. The strips use a combination of spring and stud/nut clips to hold them on. In addition to the side strips, The Four Hundred script helps hold one front fender piece in position and parking light the other. Been lots of years since I had one apart but seem to recall some small notches on each edge of the door piece where the clips which hold the side strips are located. The notches help keep it from sliding. The parts items you mention may be what is holding the small piece next to the light.

Posted on: 4/10 20:12
Howard
 Top 


Re: RIk's 56 ultramatic
#39
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
That is a 54 only motor and relay box which had a two relays in the enclosure used for reversing instead of the separate but oppositely wound field coils most of the postwar Packard reversible motors thru 56 had. I think it might have been sourced from Autolite. Don't remember ever seeing one up close and have not been able to find a Packard wire diagram for that optional all electric seat. It would be 6v so I would consider that setup to be relatively rare. Some Ford products used the same motor/relay setup for both seats and windows.

Posted on: 4/10 19:38
Howard
 Top 


Re: PS Cap Gasket
#40
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
I've never tried it but if you have the new style cap wonder if you could sort of make a gentle bend and twist in the gasket to elongate the hole to a more oval shape and starting on one side work it over the center piece and around. Doesn't look like the hole is very big and cork doesn't stretch but it must have been doable if a replacement gasket was available. If you have the old style cap with the dipstick then you would probably need to remove the dipstick. I couldn't tell if the center piece was pressed over the tab or spot welded in but maybe you could. If pressed and could be removed and reattached, maybe that is how it could be done.

If spot welded I doubt if the gasket was in position when the center piece was installed during mfg but guess it was possible. If making the hole more oval won't work and the gasket was installed later and is cemented in, I wonder if there was a slit in the old one and that is how it was done.

Attach file:



jpg  cap.jpg (280.98 KB)
209_66170d2287ef1.jpg 1356X1584 px

Posted on: 4/10 17:08
Howard
 Top 



TopTop
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 1782 »



Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved