Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
74 user(s) are online (51 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 72

TxGoat, Fyreline, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2)

Re: Packard Caribbean comparison 1955 vs 1956
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

CarFreak
See User information
another difference that doesnt seem to have been brought up is the rear brakes. In 55 you needed a heavy duty puller to get the drum off. In 56 the rear brake drums could easily be pulled off by hand like any other rear drum brake car from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s etc. I am not to sure if you would be the one doing the maintenance on your future purchase, but something to keep in mind if it would sway your opinion from one or the other.

Sincerely
Current care taker of a 56 Caribbean

Posted on: Today 9:52
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Packard Caribbean comparison 1955 vs 1956
#12
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
Quote:
In 56 the rear brake drums could easily be pulled off by hand like any other rear drum brake car from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s etc


This is true for Packard but it isn’t true across the board for other makes. For example, my three 1964 Imperials had the taper shaft and didn’t change to the flange type until 1965.

Posted on: Today 13:32
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2)




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved