Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
84 user(s) are online (64 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 83

Nevada56Hudson, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2)

Re: Packard Caribbean comparison 1955 vs 1956
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

CarFreak
See User information
another difference that doesnt seem to have been brought up is the rear brakes. In 55 you needed a heavy duty puller to get the drum off. In 56 the rear brake drums could easily be pulled off by hand like any other rear drum brake car from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s etc. I am not to sure if you would be the one doing the maintenance on your future purchase, but something to keep in mind if it would sway your opinion from one or the other.

Sincerely
Current care taker of a 56 Caribbean

Posted on: 10/8 9:52
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Packard Caribbean comparison 1955 vs 1956
#12
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
Quote:
In 56 the rear brake drums could easily be pulled off by hand like any other rear drum brake car from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s etc


This is true for Packard but it isn’t true across the board for other makes. For example, my three 1964 Imperials had the taper shaft and didn’t change to the flange type until 1965.

Posted on: 10/8 13:32
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Packard Caribbean comparison 1955 vs 1956
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home

Pgh Ultramatic
See User information
Quote:

CarFreak wrote:
another difference that doesnt seem to have been brought up is the rear brakes. In 55 you needed a heavy duty puller to get the drum off. In 56 the rear brake drums could easily be pulled off by hand like any other rear drum brake car from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s etc. I am not to sure if you would be the one doing the maintenance on your future purchase, but something to keep in mind if it would sway your opinion from one or the other.

Sincerely
Current care taker of a 56 Caribbean


Interesting point but unimportant overall as a nice puller is not even $100 on Amazon. Oh, and the twin traction diffs in 56 can have the own issues regarding unobtanium parts. I imagine the regular 56 rear end is easy to maintain like the 55, but many of these would have had the twin traction option.

Posted on: 10/8 21:49
1955 400 | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Deluxe | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Super Panama | Registry
Email (Parts/service inquiries only, please. Post all questions on the forum.)
service@ultramatic.info
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2)





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved