Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I don't know where you heard that, but torsion bars are designed to twist one way and one way only. Packard had two different bars designed to turn CW or CCW. If they could have turned either way they would only have had to make and stock one part - BIG savings.
Posted on: 2009/11/9 9:59
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I remember reading it somewhere on this website.
Posted on: 2009/11/9 10:02
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Packard had two different bars designed to turn CW or CCW. If they could have turned either way they would only have had to make and stock one part - BIG savings.
I'm certain Randy's correct on this - as I recall in manufacture they were pre-twisted and shot-peened or given some similar treatment, meaning they were configured for one-way use only. I suspect even if you could get the hexes to align to install on the opposite side, failure would be right around the corner. Remember, these were meant to twist, axles aren't. Different metallurgy entirely. I'm a bit curious where the axle that started this thread broke? When they break at the threaded end it's almost always the result of a inadequately tighted axle nut, or using a lubricant on the taper. If it broke elsewhere, a picture of the fracture would be interesting.
Posted on: 2009/11/9 10:13
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I KNEW I wasn't dreaming this and read it somewhere on here (I didn't remember the part about the "reverse stress" Craig mentioned):
Quote: Quote: Post #27: packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb ... lat&order=ASC&type=&mode=0&start=20 Maybe you two will start to realize I'm not the source of the misinformation that you purport, only the repeater.
Posted on: 2009/11/9 10:50
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Here is the article.(I hope)
Posted on: 2009/11/11 6:36
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Thank you Kevin. Brian
Posted on: 2009/11/11 21:02
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
i thought the idea was to twist them one way only. If you bend or twist a piece of metal back and forth, back and forth it will fatigue and break.
Have even heard of axles snapping because the driver had a habit of shifting from reverse to forward while the car was still moving.
Posted on: 2009/11/11 21:47
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 Standard 8 Broke axle question???
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Webmaster
|
Yeah I agree. I am not sure that reversing the axels will lead to a longer life. I would think that the opposite is more likely!
Posted on: 2009/11/11 22:56
|
|||
-BigKev
1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog 1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog |
||||
|