Re: Fuel gauge
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
What kind of sending unit did you use -- a Packard item from a vendor or something else? 48-50 have a different type sender than other years. If a Packard item, is it the correct one for the tank -- there were two different senders for two different size tanks.
Posted on: 2014/5/2 19:08
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: Fuel gauge
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi:
I ordered this sending unit from Kanters. They got my old one before they sent out the new one. Before I installed it I had a shop to boil out the tank and seal it inside and out. An excellent garage did the work. Even checked the ground. I suspect the gauge. JE PS: I think that Kanters rebuilt the one that I sent to them. JE
Posted on: 2014/5/2 19:39
|
|||
|
Re: Fuel gauge
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The way Packard had the mechanics test gauges was to use a known good sender. Since the 48-50 used a bimetal heater type sender not easily available today, that is not really feasible anymore. In other years Packard used straight resistance type senders with differing values depending on which brand gauges were used so none are a direct substitution.
There was a poster at the PAC forum who did some testing on his 49 and found some resistance values that worked. His sender was not rebuildable so he decided to convert to a straight resistance aftermarket type sender. As far as I know, his substitution has been successful.packardclub.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2302 Unless you have access to a known good gauge to test in your car, you might read thru his posts and duplicate the resistance values he used and see if your gauge responds with the same readings. Without having another sender, that would probably be the best way to test your gauge.
Posted on: 2014/5/2 20:14
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: Fuel gauge
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have gas gauge problems on both my Packards; a 39 120 and a 51 200. I was visiting my friendly local Hudson mechanic today, who is rebuilding a 46 Jeep. He had to buy a new body, but still has the old one. On the floor board of the body was round embossed access plate for getting to the master cylinder. I have stolen it from him and will be cutting a hole in the trunk of probably the 39 first, and installing the access plate on it so that I can easily get to the gas gauge sender unit without having to breath gas fumes while draining the tank. There is always about ten more gallons in the tank than I thought. I'll post photos when I do it.
Here's a website for the part. $22 kaiserwillys.com/product/716/willys-jeep ... loor-brace-repair-parts-accessories
Posted on: 2014/5/2 21:54
|
|||
|
Re: Fuel gauge
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I had a 49 Packard with non operating fuel gage. Quick check to determine if sender or gage is to ground the sender wire-if gage reads full it is the sender( donot leave it grounded long-it could damage gage). I found the problem was with the sender-sent it out for rebuild-came back it did not read correctly-had to send it back to rebuilder-second time worked ok. Point is as mentioned above Packard used a bimetal sender in the 48-50 yrs and even the Packard wizards screw them up.
Posted on: 2014/5/3 7:41
|
|||
|
Re: Fuel gauge
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I had a 49 Packard with non operating fuel gage. Quick check to determine if sender or gage is to ground the sender wire-if gage reads full it is the sender( donot leave it grounded long-it could damage gage). I found the problem was with the sender-sent it out for rebuild-came back it did not read correctly-had to send it back to rebuilder-second time worked ok. Point is as mentioned above Packard used a bimetal sender in the 48-50 yrs and even the Packard wizards screw them up.
Posted on: 2014/5/3 7:41
|
|||
|