Re: Engine, Tach, and Speedster Questions
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
O_D,
I have never found information specific to recommended sustained cruise rpm. I think theoretically the 35 and latter inserted engines would be a bit higher than the earlier babbited engines. The nature of these engines is obviously in the realm of torque. The question of an actual sustainable rpm number may be difficult as few cars equipped with 320's would have had tachs. The magic in all this is figuring out what gearing v. what torque and hp, and what is the sustainable engine rpm all working happily together to yield the best clip of road speed. In my case, I have a very unique set of circumstances. 39 was the only year a 320 could be had with overdrive. The 39 Super 8 came in at 3930 dry weight, and is fairly aerodynamic. I am pretty convinced that a happy medium between reasonable rpm / cruise speed can be obtained (best of both worlds). Jim
Posted on: 2009/1/4 23:54
|
|||
|
Re: Engine, Tach, and Speedster Questions
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
I have not heard of high speed gear sets for other than the '27 and later big cars and the similar vintage Standard Eights, but that does not mean they don't exist.
Since both Packard and 9 inch Ford are "third member" ( variously termed "meat ball" and "pumpkin" by gear heads) rear axles, I wonder how practical it would be to adapt a nine inch 3.25:1 "pumpkin" to the 526 housing. This of course would require some axle spline magic. Having a retirement machine shop with seriously large equipment, I would not mind playing around with this idea. Here is a nine inch housing I did that was written up in Street Rodder Magazine in the nineties. John Oder img.photobucket.com/albums/v337/johnoder/Ford9/01.jpg
Posted on: 2009/1/19 13:53
|
|||
|
Re: Engine, Tach, and Speedster Questions
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
For a period-correct tachometer, I'd look for one of the old Stewart-Warner mechanical tachometers from a diesel application. Most of these were 0-3500 RPMs and that would be plenty for your engine. It shouldn't spend any time above that anyway.
Here's a couplecgi.ebay.com/RARE-STEWART-WARNER-WHITE-F ... rksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66%3A2|65%3A3|39%3A1|240%3A1318 cgi.ebay.com/Stewart-Warner-4-6-Cylinder ... rksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66%3A2|65%3A3|39%3A1|240%3A1318 FWIW, today's better oils are the best friend babbitt bearings ever had. thnx, jack vines
Posted on: 2009/1/20 11:28
|
|||
|
Re: Engine, Tach, and Speedster Questions
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Another source perhaps for a period tachometer would be the sites that cater to vintage small boats, almost all inboard types had mechanical tachometers.
Posted on: 2009/1/20 13:55
|
|||
|
Re: Engine, Tach, and Speedster Questions
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
John,
I would think the 9" third member would require quite an adapter to fit to the Packard housing. How about machining a Ford ring and pinion to fit the Packard pieces? Ron
Posted on: 2009/1/27 12:57
|
|||
|
Re: Engine, Tach, and Speedster Questions
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
"How about machining a Ford ring and pinion to fit the Packard pieces?"
Unlikely that the Hypoid offset (how much lower the pinion centerline is than the axle centerline) would be the same. There is also the problem of physical size. The Ford has a 9" OD ring gear and the Packard is larger. These two considerations makes getting the Ford pinion in the right place in the Packard housing difficult to say the least. John Oder On edit: I just scaled the 7th/8th Series rear axle breakdown on page 113 of the parts book. I know the straight part of the axle shaft is 1.750" because I have a 740/745 axle in the shop. Using this figure I find the ring gear to be 12 1/2" OD or thereabouts. I would not of thought it was quite that large. JO
Posted on: 2009/1/28 13:13
|
|||
|