Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
205 user(s) are online (196 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 204

DM37, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2)

Re: 47 Packard Speedster
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

Ernie Vitucci
See User information
Good Morning all...I think that this is a nice creative design. It's not a stock Packard, but many people could drive it and enjoy it. Someone had a bit of talent to build this machine! Big Kev is working on a 37 with a Jag engine!...for me, any Packard that is kept on the road, stock or modified is cool. Just my humble opinion...Ernie in Arizona

Posted on: 4/30 11:38
Caretaker of the 1949-288 Deluxe Touring Sedan
'Miss Prudence' and the 1931 Model A Ford Tudor 'Miss Princess'
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 47 Packard Speedster
#12
Home away from home
Home away from home

Joe Santana
See User information
I’m sorry, Ernie, but you are entirely wrong. Leeeedy and SuperDuperPooperOverdrive have it right. Someone who takes a perfectly authentic Packard from the factory and starts chopping it up, imposing his own lack of aesthetics on the body is a criminal (IMHO). Wholesale lowering windows, slicing God-given hood ornamentation in half, ripping out beautiful fluted plastic dashes and replacing them with swirly sheet metal from Ace Hardware, hot-rodding it with restomod suicide doors from Summit, well, I just don’t know what to say, Ernie. It just agonizes me to look at how Packards of the late ‘30s and ‘40s were ravaged by the likes of Dutch Darrin. It makes me puke, but I know you disagree. And some other people do, too. Some of them pay 2, 3, 4 times what an untouched, real factory model is worth.

And this guy who deflowered that ’47. Big sinner, totally out of keeping with the times, unless you consider that worthless ’48 Tucker, which if the back wasn’t enough boat-tail, the front was. There is no creativity or craftsmanship in desecrating the purist art deco lines of a ’47 Packard. Just shame.

And these more recent mongrel brands follow in that trash tradition like the Excalibur in my son’s collection. Studebaker frame, Chevy engine, Mercedes grille. OMG, straight pipes and noisy as hell. Pay no mind that Tony Curtis was stupid enough to buy one of these Heinz 57 contraptions, just like air-head Hollywood stars fell for Darrins. Or the fact that they are tons of fun to drive. Some people with too much money don’t have the knowledge to appreciate authenticity. Just to bolster my argument, here’s a photo of me with Tony Curtis on location for The Midnight Story in ’56. Ha ha, Ernie.

Attach file:



png  48TuckerBack.png (115.53 KB)
1067_66312e3b9a7df.png 924X548 px

png  48TuckerFront.png (1,516.09 KB)
1067_66312e516b767.png 1254X952 px

jpeg  JSantana68ExcaliburSS.JPEG (738.92 KB)
1067_66312e6d2086a.jpeg 1632X1224 px

png  ExcaliburSSTonyCurtis.png (1,502.65 KB)
1067_66312e826f5a9.png 1032X1096 px

jpg  MidnightStory.jpg (2,546.96 KB)
1067_66312f4b5c16a.jpg 2100X1274 px

Posted on: 4/30 12:55
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 47 Packard Speedster
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home

TxGoat
See User information
I wouldn't mind owning one of Dutch Darrin's lead sleds.... the things probably weighed three tons though!

Posted on: 4/30 13:43
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 47 Packard Speedster
#14
Home away from home
Home away from home

r1lark
See User information
Quote:

Packard Don wrote:
Whoever built this and from whatever it was made, I agree with TxGoat that it looks good. Certainly banning something like this isn't a solution either. Then you would need to ban Ross and his Packups and remove the entire modification section. Where do you draw the line? Adding disk brakes? Putting in third-party and aftermarket components? Replacing panels with new ones?


Don, you took the words right outta my mouth! Let's support each other, not tear each other down.

Posted on: 5/1 12:39
Paul
www.studebakerskytop.com
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 47 Packard Speedster
#15
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Darrin180
See User information
The 1940 Darrin weighed 4121 lbs. and the 160 convertible weighed 3825 lbs.. Lot of the wt. difference being the wood used in the doors and quarter panels on the Darrin...

Posted on: 5/2 22:29
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2)





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved