Re: First Packard, 51? 200
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The previous owner said he made an abrupt stop and his well endowed wife flew forward because of the lack of seat belts and "busted" the windshield. ![]()
Posted on: Today 10:11
|
|||
|
Re: First Packard, 51? 200
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The previous owner said he made an abrupt stop and his well endowed wife flew forward because of the lack of seat belts and "busted" the windshield. That would indeed bust it! Quote: Some states, in the past, titled the car by the date it was first sold, regardless of the model year. If states did that, I’m not sure they were supposed to as the model year designation was federally defined and mandated.
Posted on: Today 12:08
|
|||
|
Re: First Packard, 51? 200
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am thinking until the strict VIN format regulations came about in the latter half of the 20th century and began to be enforced more stringently, in the days of Packard it was sort of a wild west mentality regarding auto registrations. Even though something might have been suggested or even written into law as policy it wasn't really enforced so states could do pretty much their own thing. Apparently even today states can still do a lot on their own as the licensing and inspection requirements do seem to vary quite a bit from state to state.
Posted on: Today 12:19
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|