Re: First Packard, 51? 200
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 25 in the 2592 vehicle number identifies it as a 25th series 52 model -- and the 92 indicates a 200 6 passenger standard sedan which was Packard's lowest cost offering. Almost every thing was an option on that model and your car has a few so even tho a low cost model, someone bought it fairly well equipped. 51s would be a 24th series. The chrome part of the trunk emblem is also 52.
Aside from minor trim details, 51 and 52 models were all but identical and while the memory is failing, believe they did change the front on 52s by dropping the hood letters. The K2xxxxx at the start of the motor number indicates a 52 production 288 which would be the stock for that model and is probably the original engine. Technically the 2592 - xxxxx would be the vehicle number as the car was made long before today's VIN numbers with the specific format came into existence. The last 4 or 5 digits of that number is the sequence number indicating where in the total production of that model the car was built. Numbers started at either 1001 or 2001 so it is a fairly high number and probably made near the end of the 52 model run. The K2xxxxx is the motor or engine number and even though it was a number that was lost or changed if an engine was swapped, some states used it instead of the vehicle number to register a car at the time before the VIN became the standard. In those cases there could apparently be a state issued number that might be required if the original engine and number was changed. California is a state that used motor numbers and some fine examples of weird motor numbers have turned up on the forum posted by owners of long time Calif cars. Those numbers are assumed to be state issued but AFAIK, no documentation has surfaced to prove that..
Posted on: Today 12:45
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: First Packard, 51? 200
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great story and great save! The first time I saw my '53 Cavalier, Feb 2023, it was froze into the ground at a wreckers who had picked it up at a car auction. I had not idea what it was, but my son had seen it on facebook and I went to "just have a look"! LOL, you know how that goes! It was like a abandoned puppy begging for me to take it home. A month later it was in my garage and has been so much fun to work on and drive ever since! We have great adventures together, both driving and restoring! I'm sure you'll have great adventures with your car too, it sounds like your have already!
![]() ![]()
Posted on: Today 12:48
|
|||
|
Re: First Packard, 51? 200
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great information, I forgot to write down the engine number before posting this. I pretty much knew it was something like that when titled or maybe a new title was issued somewhere down the line, who knows. I see the people at the license plate agency fairly often and one of the new ones said "that's it? Thats not enough characters for a VIN.." for one of the last old trucks I put on the road. Thanks!
That 53 is in much better condition than what I drug home! Great looking car!
Posted on: Today 13:40
|
|||
|
Re: First Packard, 51? 200
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
As Howard said, 1951 had block letters across the hood while 1952 did not. Instead, 1952 had a Packard crest on the grille which was placed where the three little holes are. 1952 also had a one-year-only hood ornament which stood up like 1951’s but with swept-back wings. Your ornament was standard on the senior models such as the Patrician 400 or the 300 but on your car is was an accessory and the wings are fragile so handle with care! The stock, base hood ornament was flatter with no discernible shape but something like an airplane.
1951 and 1952 were, again as Howard said, very similar but while some items such as the trunk emblem look the same, they are not interchangeable. I’ve had several 1951 and 1952 Packards and still have quite a few small parts such as the hood latch panel (yours appears to be rusted out) so let me know if you need anything or check with one of our dealers listed in the Directory who might be closer to you. As a California licensed VIN verifier, I would never use an engine number if something else on the car itself is available. Engines can be changed but typically the body isn’t so if your vehicle number tag is clearly readable, then by all means use it on the title. Although I’ve heard before that some states use the engine number, it defies logic to do so!
Posted on: Today 14:26
|
|||
|