Happy Thanksgiving and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
396 user(s) are online (322 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 3
Guests: 393

Packard Don, CCR, dick29, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 2 3 (4)

Re: V8 Model Production Figures
#31
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

BH
See User information
Keith,

Mind you, I only worked on content for the 55-56 and the 57-58 pages; BigKev did 51-54, and started working back through the years.

I don't recall finding any errors being a matter of percentage as much as they were typographical in nature - transposition of characters. I suspect the genealogy of published figures can be traced back to the 56executive's document that or another copy of it. Where there is one...

Bigger problem I found was misintrepretation of some model numbers - namely some of the Packardbakers. Though WRONG in several published references, they are correct here at P'Info - thanks to the Studebaker parts book.

Perhaps things fell through the cracks in trying to meet some sort of deadline for these third-party publications, but once it goes to press, that's it - unless there is a subsequent, revised edition.

One BIG benefit of online publication is ability to make corrections in relatively short order.

Posted on: 2010/2/21 18:00
 Top  Print   
 


Re: V8 Model Production Figures
#32
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
When doing the 54 and prior years I found lots of issues where both online and published resources conflicted with one another. Weights and prices were the most common to not agree with one another. I have even seen Packard documentation that had several different weights listed for the same model. I guess it depends who weighted it that day with what accessories installed.

Posted on: 2010/2/22 1:24
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: V8 Model Production Figures
#33
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
"online and published resources conflicted with one another. Weights and prices were the most common to not agree.."

Yes. But again one has to look at the percentage of variations. If the variations are all within 5% of each other then i would consider all them accurate statistics. Especialy when dealing with populations of at least 30 units or more.

Corporate world deals in percentages. There is no way to account every nut, bolt cotter pin nor even weights and total units built to a 0% level of error. No more than we can account for every gallon of water we use in our houshold on a monthly or even daily basis. A small percentage of error is real world fact of life on large volumn.

Posted on: 2010/2/22 7:57
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 2 3 (4)





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
32nd Annual Florida Packard Club Meet
01/26/2025
46th Annual Texas Packard Meet
04/03/2025 - 04/06/2025
Packard Salon - Calling All Twelves
05/27/2025 - 05/29/2025
58th Annual National Meet
05/31/2025 - 06/06/2025
AACA Fall Meet (Hershey)
10/06/2025 - 10/10/2025
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved