Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
155 user(s) are online (141 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 154

uwe, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2)

Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Thanks BH for the more specific info. I'll have to look at my rods again but it seems to me that niether of the 2wo rods from either of my 5672's had any kind of kink or extra bend in them. But one IS shorter than the other.

Using the shorter rod made trunk latch operation much much better.

Posted on: 2010/12/7 11:14
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#12
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
One thing I was curious about is the bar itself. JP's has a considerable bend and appears larger whereas mine is straight and maybe 3/16 diameter. I can see the memo addressing a straight bar being too long and being taken care of with a small bend but his already has a large one. How many bars were there?

Posted on: 2010/12/7 11:24
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Look back at Packards1 post on page 1. He claims 3hree rods (bars). I only know of 2wo but i'm not exactly a seasoned Packard parts expert either. I'll go dig out my rod and take a look.

Posted on: 2010/12/7 11:27
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#14
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
I checked both rods in my possession. BOTH are STREIGHT, and 1/4 inch diameter. One is just shorter than the other.

Posted on: 2010/12/7 11:36
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#15
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
I'm wondering the 'typo' in the Zone letter that BH cites is not a typo after all but maybe the part number for one of the campaign rods.

Oh!! Wait a minute. Maybe scrap that idea about not being a typo. Probably falls into the category of "endless guessing" or "Simple solutions to complex problems" or maybe just my wine "fogged memmory".

GUFWAhah ha ha ha ha

Posted on: 2010/12/7 11:37
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#16
Home away from home
Home away from home

Joel Ray
See User information
JP's picture at the start of this thread shows the curved rod. Here are the pics I just loaded that show the other two. The bent one is mounted on my 400 and was removed from my Caribbean where it was installed in 1956. It was manufactured like you see it, not bent later.

Attach file:



jpg  (34.64 KB)
6_4cfe8501c9beb.jpg 1024X768 px

jpg  (17.02 KB)
6_4cfe8512051bb.jpg 1024X768 px

Posted on: 2010/12/7 14:04
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#17
Home away from home
Home away from home

John Payne
See User information
Just letting you know that I have taken PackardV8's repair fix, done a few mod's and fitted the final product, and I'm happy to report mission accomplished - and it works!

The attached pics show the pieces and the final, modified, adapter (sorry about fuzzy pic). The plate is 3mm steel and the old adapter is glued to it with Loctite 401 (super duper super glue) to make sure it stayed in place during reassembly. The shaft is the bolt which was cut and welded into position in the plate. I actually forgot about the rotation of the barrel in the casing initially which caused the bolt head to foul on the end of the casing. It then had to be reground, rewelded and ground flat to avoid this.

The main problem after this was reassembly as it had to be done in the trunk lid. While laying upside down in the trunk, getting the spring to sit in place while the adapter is bolted into place proved to be a real pain in the proverbial. Also, while I had everything apart I used split pins to hold each end of the rod linkage. By the way, the bend in mine now points to the rear of the car, not sideways like in the other pic. It might have pointed to the front originally but was easier to reassemble this way. Cheers, John

Attach file:



jpg  (122.55 KB)
237_4d1c214774d5f.jpg 1600X1200 px

jpg  (72.77 KB)
237_4d1c21a560b98.jpg 1600X1200 px

jpg  (44.66 KB)
237_4d1c220c8e364.jpg 1600X1200 px

Posted on: 2010/12/30 1:09
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#18
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
Congratulations, nicely done!

Posted on: 2010/12/30 10:06
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#19
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

BH
See User information
JP -

Thanks for showing us your implementation of PackardV8's concept/prototype fix, which he provided (as previously referenced in this thread) in post #25 of another thread on the 56 Trunk Lock from a couple of years ago.

Excellent craftsmanship on your part - should be an inspiration to all hands-on owners who encounter same problem!

Posted on: 2010/12/30 10:20
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '56 Trunk Lock
#20
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Using the 3mm (1/8" thick) piece of steel should make it bullet proof.

As a side note: To those that do not have welding equipment then the loctite (cylindrical parts holding formula) or sweat soldering with tinners paste, (NOT solder) or maybe even JB Weld for this application mite be a sufficient sustitute for welding.

Posted on: 2010/12/30 17:37
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2)





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved