Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
251 user(s) are online (184 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 249

dallas, Ross, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



(1) 2 »

Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

Ken_P
See User information
So, I'm in the middle of restoring my frame. My hard brake lines are all shot, and I think I'm a reasonably handy guy, so I'm going to give it a go on making my own brake lines.

Trying to decide between Cu-Ni and steel brake line. I've heard the Cu-Ni is slightly easier to work, and I'm strongly attracted to its corrosion resistant properties, but I thought I would get some thoughts before I proceed.

Not that it should make a difference, but I'm working on a '37 115c.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 19:12
1937 120 1092 - Original survivor for driving and continued preservation. Project blog / Registry

1937 115 1082 - Total basket case, partial restoration, sold Hershey 2015 Project blog / Registry
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#2
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
Steel is a pain to double flare so anything that is better in that regard gets a vote here. High dollar European cars apparently have been using the cu-ni for years and seem to stop OK.

Several other forums on more modern cars mention buying tubing from FedHill and offhand didn't see anything negative reported. One concern might be the fittings and if the size you need is available for the size tubing. I don't think there would be any dielectric considerations if the size fitting needed were only available in steel but also something to investigate.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 19:28
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home

Rusty O\'Toole
See User information
I live in the rust belt where steel brake lines commonly rust thru in 20 years. That is on everyday cars exposed to rain mud and snow year round.

On collector cars they last much longer.

How long do you plan on owning your car? If it is no more than 20 years I recommend you use regular steel.Your local parts store has brake lines in various lengths preflared. If you want to be pernickety about length you may have to shorten one but that only means making one flare rather than 2.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 20:19
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

Ken_P
See User information
Well, I'm 29, and if I'm going to put the blood, sweat, and tears into restoring it, doubt I can think of a reason to sell it. My plan was to just get a 25' roll of tubing. I made 4 practice flares today, and I think I cracked the code- the 4th was nearly indistinguishable from the factory flare. This was on a scrap piece of 1/4" steel tubing.

I have one line that is too long to do in one piece unless I work from a roll, so my plan was to just do all six from the same roll.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 20:33
1937 120 1092 - Original survivor for driving and continued preservation. Project blog / Registry

1937 115 1082 - Total basket case, partial restoration, sold Hershey 2015 Project blog / Registry
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#5
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
Napa sells coated mild steel lines that are easy to bend and flare, and are polymer coated for rust prevention.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 21:01
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home

Rusty O\'Toole
See User information
Good plan. Here is another trick I use. Take off the old line without bending it. Use it as a pattern to bend up the new line. I start at one end, make the flare, then bend and tape them together with masking tape as I go along.

The result is a pretty good fit, not perfect because the old one always gets a little bent up taking it off but close enough that with a little tweek here and there you can get it to look factory perfect.

I also tape up the end of the line before I install it, it prevents dirt getting in and stops the nut from sliding around.

To unroll the tubing and keep it straight step on the end of the roll and unroll it on the floor. It will be nearly straight and a little careful bending by hand will make it perfectly straight.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 21:20
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#7
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Randy Berger
See User information
I'll double-check tomorrow, but I think steel is mandatory for brake lines in Penna. State insp. requires it.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 21:57
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#8
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Ken P writes:
"I made 4 practice flares today, and I think I cracked the code- the 4th was nearly indistinguishable from the factory flare. This was on a scrap piece of 1/4" steel tubing."

Was that a DOUBLE INVERTED flare u made or a single flare???? Brake lines must be double inverted flare. The double flare is not all that hard to make. The end of tube must be cut square with a tube cutter. Champfer the end of the tube. A file will work for that. Be sure to debur the ID of the tube after cutting it. Then flare it. Use some brake fluid as slight lubricant for flaring operation.

I would use the standard steel brake line because that is what has been used for so many decades. Go with what u know.

Posted on: 2011/6/22 22:52
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#9
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

BH
See User information
What has been referred to as "Cu-Ni, here, is perfectly legal for state inspection in PA, as I believe it is only a copper-nickel (electroplated) coating over steel. In fact, the part number was prefixed "CNC-", which I took as an abbreviation for "Copper Nickel Coated". It's been a couple of years since I've used the stuff, but it was only available in 25-foot coils of 3/16-, 1/4-, 5/16- and 3/8-inch diameters then.

I didn't care for the coated steel tubing that had been available previously, which was covered in a dark green polymer(?) material. It didn't seem fit in the flaring dies, and I also noticed the coating crack at the flare, which is a point that often leaks due to rust.

In contrast, the copper-nickel coated tubing fits the flaring tools the same as steel and is easier to bend. However, bulk coiled (non-coated) steel tubing is also easier to bend than the pre-flare straight lengths of steel tubing.

As I've routinely seen factory-formed steel lines rust out in much less than ten years around these parts, the copper-nickel tubing is a worthwhile investment for a daily driver.

However, I prefer to purchase 25-foot coils and/or pre-flared straight lengths of the plain double-walled steel type, as needed, for "recreational" vehicles and bend 'em myself. The key is to find some good bending tools. I have one for general purpose bends, but another that is specially made for tight bends.

Yet, just prior to installtion, I also like to pull the nut (fitting) back from the flare and apply a thin coat of Lubriplate to the outside of the tubing to help prevent rust that normally causes things to seize, later.

Posted on: 2011/6/24 12:20
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Cu-Ni vs. Steel for brake lines
#10
Home away from home
Home away from home

Ken_P
See User information
Quote:

PackardV8 wrote:
Was that a DOUBLE INVERTED flare u made or a single flare???? Brake lines must be double inverted flare. The double flare is not all that hard to make. The end of tube must be cut square with a tube cutter. Champfer the end of the tube. A file will work for that. Be sure to debur the ID of the tube after cutting it. Then flare it. Use some brake fluid as slight lubricant for flaring operation.

I would use the standard steel brake line because that is what has been used for so many decades. Go with what u know.


Nope, I just put a bolt in the tube and bashed it with a hammer for a while. :) Of course it was a double flare, that's why I practiced! Any knuckle dragger can make a single flare. The two tricks I've found: de-burring the inside of the tube with a slightly over-sized drill bit works much better than the de-burring tool on my cutter, and putting the flare tool in a vice makes things much easier to flare.

I decided to go with a coil of steel tubing. My goal is to have a restored driver, not a concours car, but the Cu-Ni tubing is, well, copper colored!

Thanks for all the thoughts.

Posted on: 2011/6/24 15:43
1937 120 1092 - Original survivor for driving and continued preservation. Project blog / Registry

1937 115 1082 - Total basket case, partial restoration, sold Hershey 2015 Project blog / Registry
 Top  Print   
 




(1) 2 »





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
46th Annual Texas Packard Meet
04/03/2025 - 04/06/2025
Packard Salon - Calling All Twelves
05/27/2025 - 05/29/2025
58th Annual National Meet
05/31/2025 - 06/06/2025
AACA Fall Meet (Hershey)
10/06/2025 - 10/10/2025
South Pacific Packard Club 2026 Rally
03/22/2026 - 03/28/2026
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved