Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
186 user(s) are online (177 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 185

Ayden.jakob03, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




Ultramatic Oil Cooler Lining
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

Gary
See User information
I've been thinking that there shouldn't be any problem with lining an Ultramatic Transmission Oil Cooler with a sealer such as POR 15 as long as the main body is cleaned thoroughly and liner isn't allowed to build up too thickly on the internal fluid lines. Heck, after 60 years or so, those lines have an accumulation of calcium and rust build-up on them anyway and they're still dispersing heat. Anyone see a problem with it?

Posted on: 2011/11/8 10:55
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Ultramatic Oil Cooler Lining
#2
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Bobs51
See User information
Yes. any impairment to heat transfer, in my opinion, is not good.

Posted on: 2011/11/8 12:56
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Ultramatic Oil Cooler Lining
#3
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
Shouldn't be any rust on the heat exchanger itself, it's stainless steel. Could be some scale I suppose from neglectful prior owners but a simple visual inspection should reveal that. Trying to save the mild steel outside casing by coating it is a good thought but since you won't be able to keep the coating off the heat exchanger itself, I think that in the final analysis it's probably not a good idea.

There is I believe a reason why we so often find the necks badly corroded and sometimes perforated, other than that Packard didn't consider their need to last a half-century. I think it is exacerbated by the location of the hose clamps. If the clamp is well down on the hose and neck towards the cooler body, the hose will bellow a bit from the clamp tension and system pressurization and there remains a static cavity for coolant to lay dormant and once the corrosion inhibitor is exhausted (2 years?) you can get attack of the neck from the outside above the clamp location (which is the common observation). At least that's my theory. I think the clamp should be as near the end of the neck as practical. And since this area is the most vulnerable, I think your idea of using POR is a good one, but I'd limit it to the inside and outside of the two water necks.

Posted on: 2011/11/8 13:32
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Ultramatic Oil Cooler Lining
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

Gary
See User information
Quote:

Owen_Dyneto wrote:
Shouldn't be any rust on the heat exchanger itself, it's stainless steel. Could be some scale I suppose from neglectful prior owners but a simple visual inspection should reveal that. Trying to save the mild steel outside casing by coating it is a good thought but since you won't be able to keep the coating off the heat exchanger itself, I think that in the final analysis it's probably not a good idea.

There is I believe a reason why we so often find the necks badly corroded and sometimes perforated, other than that Packard didn't consider their need to last a half-century. I think it is exacerbated by the location of the hose clamps. If the clamp is well down on the hose and neck towards the cooler body, the hose will bellow a bit from the clamp tension and there remains a static cavity for coolant to lay dormant and once the corrosion inhibitor is exhausted (2 years?) you can get attack of the neck from the outside above the clamp location (which is the common observation). At least that's my theory. I think the clamp should be as near the end of the neck as practical. And since this area is the most vulnerable, I think your idea of using POR is a good one, but I'd limit it to the inside and outside of the two water necks.


I agree on all counts Owen. I just had new ends welded on to my existing cooler made out of mild stainless exhaust tubing. I suspected that there were most likely voids in the butt welds where they were joined so I wiped the welds and the remaining tubing on the inside with a coating of epoxy. I also used epoxy to fill a couple of pin holes in the body so it should be good for a few years yet. Meanwhile, I've located a good spare cooler that will allow me to keep the old gal going long enough to outlast me.

Posted on: 2011/11/9 6:29
 Top  Print   
 









- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved