Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
123 user(s) are online (85 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 123

more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



(1) 2 »

What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

Jack Vines
See User information
Just reading through the chart, Packard rated everything at 3,600 RPMs for many years. In 1953/54, the horsepower peak was 4,000 RPMs. Yes, the compression was increased, but only the port design and camshaft duration really changes the horsepower peak. Did either of these change in '53? What year was the first use of the 4bbl?

thnx, jack vines

Posted on: 2009/10/20 15:15
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home

JWL
See User information
Jack, 1953 was the first year a 4 bbl carburetor was used. It was only used on the 1953 senior cars. The Clippers with the 327 engine still had the 2 bbl carburetor. Does this help? I'll leave it to the '51 - '54 experts to expand on this.

Posted on: 2009/10/20 18:14
We move toward
And make happen
What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer)
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#3
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
Jack are you starting to look at working on Straight Eights now?

"Eight in a row makes it go."

Posted on: 2009/10/20 18:45
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

Jack Vines
See User information
Hi, Kev,

One literally showed up in front of the machine shop and I thought, "Why not?" I've always been interested in them, but never had one to play with. It's a 4-bbl engine so guess that makes it a'53/54 327" or a 359". I'll be pulling it apart soon to see if it is worth rebuilding.

Due to Eric's bad influence, I keep thinking it really needs a turbo.

thnx, jack vines

Posted on: 2009/10/20 20:56
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

Eric Boyle
See User information
Quote:
Due to Eric's bad influence, I keep thinking it really needs a turbo.


Hell, I think my lawnmower needs a turbo, but just can't justify it on an Eric propelled push mower!

Jack, what's the engine number on it? That'll tell you what it is.

Posted on: 2009/10/20 21:02
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home

Jack Vines
See User information
Pretty sure it is a 327" cause that's what I could read cast on the head today. Did any of the '53/54 327" 4-bbl engines have 9-main bearings or only the 359"?

thnx, jack vines

Posted on: 2009/10/21 22:10
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home

Eric Boyle
See User information
Yes, '51-'53 327's in Senior cars were 9 main. They also made a 5 main version which is why I asked about the stamped ID number.

One thing I've learned about the straight eights is NEVER trust what the head says.

Posted on: 2009/10/21 22:12
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#8
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
Jack,

51-54 Heads are all interchangeable (as in and head will bolt to any block). Only difference really is the compression chamber. The manifolds are all interchangeable also (bolt up wise). So you could put a 4 barrel carb manifold on any of the blocks.

I actually have a 288 AT head on a '54 327 5 bearing/Solid Lifter block.

The engine number which is located on a machined pad on the block, just below the head on the drivers side of the engine towards the back will tell you exactly what motor you have, and what year it was from. It will be in a A####### format.

The first letter is the year the block is from:

M####### = 1954
L####### = 1953

The next digit is the type of motor:

2 = 288 5 Bearing Solid Lifter
3 = 327 5 bearing Solid lifter
4 = 327 5 bearing Hydraulic lifter
6 = 327 (359 in 1954) Nine Bearing Motor Hydraulic Lifter

The rest of the digits are just the sequential engine production number.

So my motor is M3#####, which is a 1954, 327 5 bearing Solid Lifter Motor.

Hope this helps.

Posted on: 2009/10/21 22:56
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#9
Home away from home
Home away from home

Jack Vines
See User information
Hi, Kev and Eric,

Thanks for the info. I'll check it out as soon as the rain stops.

Next questions:

1. Do the I8 lifters, either solid or hydraulic, have a hardened button about 1/4" thick on the bottom? This type lifter can usually be reground. Those lifters with a one-piece body usually cannot.
2. Is Egge still the only source for 327" pistons? Rumor has it their quality has improved, but I had so many bad experiences way back when with V8 pistons, I haven't bought any Egge lately.
3. Any difference between Egge and Kanter complete engine kits? Kanter seems to be a bit less expensive, if $1500 can be considered a bargain. Any other source show have a complete kit? I haven't seen any.

thnx, jack vines

Posted on: 2009/10/22 10:31
 Top  Print   
 


Re: What changed the rated horsepower RPM in 1953/54?
#10
Home away from home
Home away from home

Eric Boyle
See User information
#1, no, it's a more or less one piece body. The plunger comes out of the body,(on the hydraulic) but there's no "button" on the bottom.

#2, I would say yes, unless you go for custom pistons from one of the major piston manufacturers. Keith Black Silvolites might be a good place to try for stock pistons.

#3, Not that I'm aware of.

Posted on: 2009/10/22 11:01
 Top  Print   
 




(1) 2 »




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved