Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
73 user(s) are online (44 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 72

Packard Don, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




56 Packard 400
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

sanddoc
See User information
OK, I must be missing something.
the x-ref page shows a KYB Kg4503 for the front shocks on a 55 Packard.
Did they change for 56, as my current shock has a 2 bolt bottom support
and a single stud for the top.

In fact everywhere on the net I searched they all listed a dual
stud (top & bottom)

My current Monroe Matic, part number is 5801
best


OK, I did some more checking for Front shocks

here is a comparison between the KYB KG 4503 and the Monroe Matic 5801

KYB
compressed 9.53"
extended 14.53"
stroke\travel 5.00

Monroe
compressed 9.250
extended 14.735
travel\stroke 5.125

very, very close...
and no need to modify the lower mounting..
think, I'm back on the Monroe Matic 5801
for the 1956 year

Posted on: 2017/7/4 12:20
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 56 Packard 400
#2
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
They changed front lower shock mounting between 55-56. Don't remember ever reading the why but maybe something in conjunction with the 56 revision of the TL front load link geometry. As shown in this post there are adapters to allow the use of the different type shocks.

Posted on: 2017/7/4 12:36
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 56 Packard 400
#3
Home away from home
Home away from home

sanddoc
See User information
Thanks for that info... talk about a company waisting money.
Talk about be going nuts,, thought everyone else was wrong
Hahaha

Well the Monroe Matic 5801 work fine...
the ones that are on the car, came with the car when I bought it
back in the 80's...

guess I could just make a plate drill 3 holes and there I go..

Thanks again
Best
Dave

Posted on: 2017/7/4 13:27
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 56 Packard 400
#4
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Randy Berger
See User information
There is an adapter available to allow the single stud on bottom to be mounted on the 56. I pictured it here some time ago.

Posted on: 2017/7/4 22:23
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 56 Packard 400
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

sanddoc
See User information
hello Randy

Since the Monroe Matic (5801)

has nearly the same specs as the KYB

and it has the bar at the bottom with the 2 bolt support..

why do any extra work

Best

Posted on: 2017/7/5 11:30
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 56 Packard 400
#6
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Randy Berger
See User information
I'm not saying you should. I just pointed out what is available.

Posted on: 2017/7/5 12:41
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 56 Packard 400
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home

sanddoc
See User information
I understand Randy

But from my point of view, the monroe is the correct way
to go, because it is the way the Packard lower mount is designed.
and also because I'm Lazy.

Best

Posted on: 2017/7/5 15:39
 Top  Print   
 








Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved