Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
173 user(s) are online (167 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 172

wvsanta, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



(1) 2 3 4 ... 6 »

WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#1
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

FirstEliminator
See User information
Hi,
I am looking for a 39 or 40 160 coupe with the super 8. Prefer overdrive. No OD is o-k too.

You can e-mail direct to FirstEliminator@aol.com

thanks,
Mark

Posted on: 7/5 22:34
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
There were no 160s in 1939 as 1940 was the first year to use the designation. There were, however, Super Eights.

Posted on: 7/5 22:42
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#3
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

FirstEliminator
See User information
Thanks. I am learning the details as I go. Either way, a Super 8 coupe. I tend to lean towards the '40. Being the 39 and 40 are really close, I could go either way.

Posted on: 7/5 23:36
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

bkazmer
See User information
Not so close mechanically. The 40 is first year for the 356 engine

Posted on: 7/6 8:17
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#5
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

flackmaster
See User information
39 engine is more interesting mechanically, while the 40 engine is more "modern". the dash on a 39 is way better looking, if proper. overddrives slightly different. Best thing to do is see and drive both before deciding, and of course submitting to the Pinfo jury for support.

Posted on: 7/6 8:58
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
The 1940 R9 is much simpler and easier to get parts for that than the earlier R6 and many other differences too. I’ve owned both 1939 and 1940 Packards, albeit Junior models, I would take the 1940 any day.

Posted on: 7/6 12:19
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#7
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

FirstEliminator
See User information
Update: Leaning towards the 40 has tilted a little more today. Unless a 39 Super Eight coupe comes along at a really good deal.

Posted on: 7/6 17:52
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#8
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

FirstEliminator
See User information
Update.

Made a deal on a 1940 120. Going to pick it up on Tuesday. So now, I am looking for a 356 Super 8 engine.

It's not a 160, but it's pretty close.

Posted on: 7/7 19:59
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#9
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

flackmaster
See User information
There are several mechanical differences between the 120 and the 160, not just the engine. For starters, the 356 will shred a 120 overdrive...
At this point, I would suggest viewing the 120 as a starting point, see how you like it, and when the opportunity to compare to a 160 presents, you will have the 120 experience to work from. You can't just switch out the 120 motor for a 356....

I can refer you to my engine builder who has a 356 in line to build on spec...

Posted on: 7/7 20:33
 Top  Print   
 


Re: WTB: 1939-40 160 Coupe Super 8
#10
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

FirstEliminator
See User information
This 120 doesn't have OD. I did find a later trans with R11 OD that will get put in. The trans isn't a big deal as I own a transmission shop. While I've never built a T-85, from what I've read so far, they are decently strong.
Is there any compatibility reason why a 356 can't bolt in place of a 282? Like mounts, bell housing or length?

Posted on: 7/7 21:08
 Top  Print   
 




(1) 2 3 4 ... 6 »





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved