Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
185 user(s) are online (97 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 185

more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2) 3 »

Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#11
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Randy Berger
See User information
The forged (not cast) pieces that the tierods connect to are the same for Srs and Jrs. In 56 you could receive either system on Srs and Jrs. My original 56 400 and my 400 parts car both had Monroe
systems. My current 400 had Bendix but I switched over to Monroe - personal preference. Neither of those systems rubbed the torsion bar or the starter.

Posted on: 2008/1/28 23:18
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#12
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
MAYBE that's why they used two different PS sytems between Jr and Sr????

No, I don't think so. The reason they used both Monroe and Bendix is no doubt the same reason that they used both Autolite and Delco electrics and multiple brands of tires. Not because one is better than the other (remember, in the 40s the Senior cars used Autolite, and in the 50s the Senior cars used Delco). It was a simple matter of protecting yourself against supply shortages such as occured with the shortage of Autolite generators during the 56th series production.

Posted on: 2008/1/29 9:49
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#13
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
this is the best i could do with camera.

Attach file:



jpg  (51.02 KB)
35_479f64ed1bcd2.jpg 640X480 px

Posted on: 2008/1/29 12:40
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#14
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
another

Attach file:



jpg  (50.24 KB)
35_479f67cf385c3.jpg 640X480 px

Posted on: 2008/1/29 12:52
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#15
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
anotha

Attach file:



jpg  (41.88 KB)
35_479f6858acc8f.jpg 480X640 px

Posted on: 2008/1/29 12:54
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#16
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
another

Attach file:



jpg  (45.24 KB)
35_479f68e39fd80.jpg 640X480 px

Posted on: 2008/1/29 12:57
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#17
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
Keith,

Just an FYI, you can attached multiple pictures to the same post which makes posting them faster. If you need help with that, just then let me know.


Posted on: 2008/1/29 18:49
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#18
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
So, my question at this point is: IS the PS system (see pix above) i have correct or not???? Is it somekind of Gerry rig set up or is it factory???? I see no way to reroute the hoses.

Posted on: 2008/1/31 21:06
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#19
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
No, it's incorrect. When the spring thaw comes and I get the car up on a lift, I'll take a picture for you, but hopefully you can find a Bendix-equipped car in the interim and crawl under and take a look.

Posted on: 2008/2/1 8:57
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 55-56 PS hoses.
#20
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

BH
See User information
While I never had such a problem with either of the two V8s I have with Bendix P/S, its too cold (and frozen) to get into offsite storage, and my parts book is not at hand.

Yet, since the formed steel sleeve is attached to the cast-iron valve body by only two fastenrs, could it simply be misassembled - that is, 180-degrees out of phase?

Posted on: 2008/2/1 10:38
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2) 3 »




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved