Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
178 user(s) are online (110 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 177

Peter Packard, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




Replacing a '37 282" with a '53 327" 4-bbl - any problems?
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

Jack Vines
See User information
On another thread, I asked about swapping a '53 327" into a '49. The consensus is it is viable and gives a good horsepower boost. This opened another can of worms.

Seeing the horsepower increase available with the '53, a friend with a '37 120 with what I assume is a 282", asked if the '53 327" could be swapped into his car without too many changes.

Thought I might as well ask the experts.

jack vines

Posted on: 2011/6/26 13:25
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Replacing a '37 282" with a '53 327" 4-bbl - any problems?
#2
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
The biggest problem would be the engine mounts. The 1951-1954 motors used side mounts, and the 1950 and prior motors used a front mount. So to make it work you would need the timing cover, balancer and mount off of a 1950 and prior 288/327 to make it work somewhat elegantly.

Posted on: 2011/6/26 13:33
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Replacing a '37 282" with a '53 327" 4-bbl - any problems?
#3
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
Not sure how similar the 37 cars would be but there was a tech bulletin posted on how to put a 327 in some of the 17th series. My search terms didn't find it nor do I remember who posted it but the bulletin title is as shown. I would post the entire thing again but it is 1.2meg and it should be already here somewhere.

Attach file:



jpg  (17.19 KB)
209_4e077e915cfd4.jpg 609X206 px

Posted on: 2011/6/26 13:46
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Replacing a '37 282" with a '53 327" 4-bbl - any problems?
#4
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
Howard,

Are you talking about this one? or do you have the non-right hand drive version?

https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/article/view.article.php?437

Posted on: 2011/6/26 13:57
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Replacing a '37 282" with a '53 327" 4-bbl - any problems?
#5
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
I think it's different than those. Pretty sure it was on site, but have been wrong before. If it doesn't turn up, will try and post or send the large pdf.

Attach file:



jpg  (68.05 KB)
209_4e078c3a19545.jpg 617X800 px

jpg  (205.73 KB)
209_4e078c4318589.jpg 1203X797 px

jpg  (92.61 KB)
209_4e078c4d072eb.jpg 1220X790 px

Posted on: 2011/6/26 14:45
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Replacing a '37 282" with a '53 327" 4-bbl - any problems?
#6
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Dave Kenney
See User information
Quote:

HH56 wrote:
Not sure how similar the 37 cars would be but there was a tech bulletin posted on how to put a 327 in some of the 17th series. My search terms didn't find it nor do I remember who posted it but the bulletin title is as shown. I would post the entire thing again but it is 1.2meg and it should be already here somewhere.


I notice that the bulletin is referring to the Super Eight line (1703 etc.) with the larger 320 engine. I don't know what the difference in length is between a 1939 320, a 282 and 327 but the 327 is comparable in length to the 356 in my '47 Super Clipper and that 7" extra hood length is needed to fit the longer 356" engine. There is very little room between the fan and the radiator on this 127" wheelbase chassis. My point is that the longer 327 engine may not fit the shorter engine bay of the 120" wheelbase 282" engined cars without some modifications. Just a thought.

Posted on: 2011/6/26 16:01
______________________________________________
Dave
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Replacing a '37 282" with a '53 327" 4-bbl - any problems?
#7
Home away from home
Home away from home

Peter Packard
See User information
I believe that it would be easier to retro-fit the 288/327 to the LHD chassis because of the RHD steering column being in the way of most conversions. I have installed a few 288/327 engines in the prewar 120's and there isn't much modification other than as mentioned in the RHD PDF's. It gets a bit more complicated if you fit a Packard OEM overdrive such as an R6 as you have to modify the frame X member to allow for the longer trans and the solenoid/governor access.

Posted on: 2011/6/26 20:14
I like people, Packards and old motorbikes
 Top  Print   
 








Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved