Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
167 user(s) are online (109 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 165

dallas, Soybeanfarmer1 , more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 ... 24 25 26 (27) 28 29 30 ... 33 »

Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
I am also curious about the one large adjustable pushrod ball. Does the corresponding rocker arm have a larger pushrod socket than the rest of the rockers???

Posted on: 2014/10/5 20:37
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

Troy Taylor
See User information
Well, I think Howard was right, "Lead Foot Special". I got into the engine a little today and here is what I have going on thus far.

1. #7 push rod larger ball than rest. Rocker is the same cavity as the others. Odd......

2. large mouse nest in the intake and Right head.

3. #6 Cylinder valve stuck open 1/4 stroke.

4. Lots of loose dirt and crud in #6 and 8 cylinder

5. Solid lifters across the board with adjustable push Rods

6. Cam shaft Shot, huge crater in couple lobes.

7. with Calipers, cylinders look .20 over, will verify with telescope gauges later.

8. Pistons, Jahns racing Pistons!!!!!!!!!!!!

I will dig in a bit more tomorrow. So far, no markings on any bearings.

Attach file:



jpg  (187.44 KB)
17226_54333050e082e.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (152.35 KB)
17226_5433305b7eb8e.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (176.62 KB)
17226_543330664675d.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (156.58 KB)
17226_543330734afac.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (111.42 KB)
17226_5433307f9ca83.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (106.25 KB)
17226_5433308a63660.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (99.38 KB)
17226_5433309680183.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (190.86 KB)
17226_543330a37bd75.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (134.18 KB)
17226_543330b1195ad.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (73.33 KB)
17226_543330c469277.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (144.03 KB)
17226_543330f9956dd.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (60.30 KB)
17226_543331167312b.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (85.81 KB)
17226_5433313e042c8.jpg 1280X960 px

jpg  (127.49 KB)
17226_54333149c7db5.jpg 1280X960 px

Posted on: 2014/10/6 19:18
[url=https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

64avanti
See User information
Do you suppose that cam was metal sprayed or welded up for
performance? If those pistons clean up, perhaps they might be useful for a block that has not been bored.

Posted on: 2014/10/6 22:24
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

Jim L. in OR
See User information
Quote:

TroyT wrote:
Well, I think Howard was right, "Lead Food Special". I got into the engine a little today and here is what I have going on thus far. Odd......

2. large mouse nest in the intake and Right head.


It never ceases to amaze me the places that mice can and do find to nest in. One thing for sure, Mama Mouse didn't have to worry about cats!

Jim

Posted on: 2014/10/7 1:32
1951 200 Deluxe Touring Sedan
1951 200 Deluxe Touring Sedan (parts ?)
1951 Patrician Touring Sedan
1955 Patrician Touring Sedan
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

Troy Taylor
See User information
Back at it, I will report in tonight

Posted on: 2014/10/7 7:44
[url=https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Cli55er
See User information
other then then the shape of the top of the piston and the skirt as well, I can't really see the point of them. I guess they are forged?

Posted on: 2014/10/7 9:07
1937 Packard 138-CD Deluxe Touring Limousine
Maroon/Black 1090-1021
[url=https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/registry/View.php?ID=232]1955 Packard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
It will be interesting to see if whoever built this up found themselves a forged crankshaft; easy to recognize, open versus closed eyes on the rod throws. Other than that and perhaps future use of the pistons I suspect you've found yourself a boat anchor, though doing a post-mortem on engines is always interesting.

Posted on: 2014/10/7 9:39
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

Troy Taylor
See User information
Ok, the postmortem is complete.

Initial cause of engine failure Dropped a intake valve in cylinder #7 Crunching a chunk out of the cam lob with the solid lifter.

Secondary, blown head gasket with water severely oxidizing the aluminum piston and welding it to the cylinder. This piston is frozen solid.

Piston walls show very little wear and are not grooved in the least. Bottom mic'ed at 4.125

Crank has mild grooving as the babbiting was worn through the mains and down to the brass.

Valve stems mic'ed to spec and less than .004 wiggle, should not have to oversize.

Engine headed off to Kaley's tomorrow to be cleaned, and worked up. Heads will be cleaned and hardened seats inserted. Cam will be repaired, Kaley's has the blanks for the 374 and does a lot of Packard work for the local restoration shops. Crank Ground.

On hold on ordering parts until I get the Engine back. So for now, back to the Frame, T/L bars due in tomorrow, still waiting on the Sandblaster. Oh Well, the garage needs a good cleaning, I need to go find my wife.

Posted on: 2014/10/7 11:00
[url=https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

Troy Taylor
See User information
Another interesting side note, I just cleaned up and mic'ed a set of the valves. They are stock dimensions and dead nuts on dimensions. I will take them to the shop too and see if they may be useful unless we have to oversize the guides. The interesting thing is, these valves are not stock Packard script, they are Eaton valves.

Posted on: 2014/10/7 14:30
[url=https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1956 Packard Patrician Rebuild Project
Home away from home
Home away from home

Jack Vines
See User information
Very interesting find. It's one of the more highly modified I've seen, but not the only one to come to a bad end via valve failure.

As to the valve problem which probably killed the engine just before it was about to run the main bearings; did the head come off the valve or did the keeper pull through the retainer? Have you file-tested the retainers to determine if they are the hardened version? FWIW, don't put it back together with soft retainers.

When you say Quote:
Cam will be repaired, Kaley's has the blanks for the 374
FWIW, the '56 352" and 374" cams are the same P/N. Do they have actual unmachined cam blanks or do you mean they have the cam master to regrind your existing core?

Do you plan to run the engine with solid lifters? Any idea as the cam manufacturer and timing specifications?

There are several possibilities, from mild to full race. I have an Iskenderian 505C with 320 degrees duration and it won't idle under 1800 RPM and doesn't start pulling until 3500 RPMs. You'll definitely want to confirm the grind before putting any money into spray-welding and regrinding it. Are there any numbers stamped on the front or rear?

If you are going to use the adjustable pushrods and want to replace that odd one, Smith Brothers, in Bend, OR, http://www.pushrods.net/ was the original manufacturer and supplied them to Iskenderian.

One has never experienced frustration until he tries to set clearances with adjustable pushrods. They require four hands, one wrench for the pushrod, one wrench for the lock nut, one wrench for the adjuster and one hand for the feeler gauge. On the rear cylinder on each bank, there just isn't room for two bodies to be in position to do the job.

jack vines

Posted on: 2014/10/7 16:09
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 ... 24 25 26 (27) 28 29 30 ... 33 »




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved