Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Or am I reading the cast date wrong?
ebay.com/itm/1955-1956-Packard-Manual-TR ... 7998818?hash=item2a4fd53362&vxp=mtr Attach file: (33.87 KB)
Posted on: 2015/4/26 19:06
|
|||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
i thought automakers had to make parts for 10 years, packard ended 56, so 65 would be the end, thats about the time stude ended
Posted on: 2015/4/27 15:50
|
|||
Riki
|
||||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I'll take a wild guess on this:
Look at the TRANSMISSION bolt hole spacing on the bellhousing. I'm not familiar enuf with the Packard std trans as well as pictures can be deceiving. But it appears to me that the trans bolt hole spacing is rather LARGE for an AUTOMOTIVE or lite truck application. So my guess is that some quanttity of bellhousings were made probably for some mediam to heavy truck application. OR some other non-passenger car application. Probably MAck truck.
Posted on: 2015/4/27 16:15
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
With Packard dealers shutting down, or being shut down, I wonder how decisions were made to produce parts? Based on what was in Packard warehouses?
Posted on: 2015/4/27 17:47
|
|||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
what i understand on STD trans, they were stude trans, borg warner.
for the lark and trucks they used that trans, looks like stude kept making bell housings,, maybe ultra problems, people were putting in the std trans,
Posted on: 2015/4/27 22:12
|
|||
Riki
|
||||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962? We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. There's no evidence or documentation I've seen which substantiates the use of the Packard V8 engine or transmission factory installed in trucks. Quote: what i understand on STD trans, they were stude trans, borg warner. . for the lark and trucks they used that trans, looks like stude kept making bell housings,, The standard/manual shift bellhousings were a Packard V8-only part. It did not fit the Studebaker V8s. The Borg-Warner T85 used with it was again a Packard V8-only part. It had a different input shaft than the versions used in the '57-58 Studebaker Golden Hawks with the 289". Quote: maybe ultra problems, people were putting in the std trans, Although he's incorrect on the first part, I'll agree with Riki on the above; the later production of the standard shift bellhousing can most likely be explained by the failure of the Twin-Ultramatic and owners converting to the manual transmission. BTW - the bellhousing in the photo has been so extensively modified by welding and drilling, it's not a representative of the part. It's certainly not worth $450 IMHO. jack vines
Posted on: 2015/4/28 10:30
|
|||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
the one gentlemen is correct up until about 1973 or
around that time, Automotive companies in America had to stock parts for ten years. This was changed to 5 years in the early 70's and the onset of bigger numbers of imports. This was a great boon to the unions, can you imagine building, and stocking all those parts, you can understand why some parts of cars lasted why longer then they should have, just the cost of changing over is staggering. But when Packard went out of business the company was long obligated. There was no Packard company. No wonder Henry made the Model T for 19 years... One thing we as owners of these old cars must remember is that, they did not build cars for "collectors" There was no car clubs back then, and of course when you owned a Packard they did not plan on you doing your own work, after all Packard was the predominant luxury Car company. After Chevron shipping scrapped their US flagged ships and I was out of a job, I opened a "small" auto shop and kinda worked only on pre 1940 cars from Stude's to Packard's and even some later models. any year Fords, up to 74... and orphan cars. I've worked on 1912 Studebaker runabout, 28 Packard 25 Flint, 54 Packard, 1919 Cleveland, 36 Pierce Arrow's (2) etc: I'm out of the business now, I'm not old just that the recession killed me figured I can live better not working... hahaha sorry to bore you with all that.
Posted on: 2015/7/24 8:47
|
|||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
A few nits to pick -- Packard never went out of business. They simply stopped making cars: Packards and Clippers in Detroit, 1956 and South Bend in 1958, Studebakers in South Bend in late-1963, Canada in 1966. Along the way they bought the Studebaker Corp. in 1954, changing their name to Studebaker-Packard Corp., changing again to Studebaker Corp. in 1962. After 1966, they made money selling items other than cars and trucks.
And, yes, there were many car clubs years ago. The Packard Club started in 1953, the Classic Car Club in 1952, and the AACA way back in 1935.
Posted on: 2015/7/24 21:57
|
|||
|
Re: Were they making packard parts in 1962?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Isn't the old Studebaker Corp still around in one form or another. After they diversified didn't they have an interest in Madison Square Garden for awhile or maybe under another name still do?
Posted on: 2015/7/24 22:16
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|