![Bottom Bottom](https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/templates/images/icon/down.png)
![Previous Topic Previous Topic](https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/templates/images/icon/previous.png)
![Next Topic Next Topic](https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/templates/images/icon/next.png)
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The BTV has probably been the subject of a dozen or more threads that just go on forever. How about we give it a rest for a while? If some new information comes to light as the result of Fred's analysis, or otherwise, we're all ears, but in the meantime, we just keep recycling the same old stuff.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 12:14
|
|||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Newcomers have questions. That is one reason why the "same old stuff" seems to get recycled. They're new folks and don't realize how long the BTV discussions have raged on.
Post #28 above is a partial NOT completed list of topic headings covering the BTV. I see no point in ending the discussions just because someone shows up recently with a promised future answer. Post #28 above (of THIS thread) contains some but not all of the discussions for reference for newcommers or anyone to review. Or to put it another way, i'm sure there are many (but not necessarily all) vendors and service providers of the BTV that would like to see the BTV discussions stop. I vote to keep them open. NO ONE is forced to participate.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 15:17
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'd like to think that new-comers would use the "search" function to see if their question has already been posed and discussed, in which case they'd find more than they could read in one sitting on this topic. But that doesn't seem to often be the case, so I reluctantly agree with you.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 15:27
|
|||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
These scans from a Mercedes Benz Parts Book circa 1960 probably won't help the discussion much but they show the system used in the late 50's-early 60's era. This is an ATE unit.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 16:49
|
|||
______________________________________________
Dave |
||||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
@ Clipper 47: Looks very much like the HydroVac on a 1964 GT Hawk I had. My car was disc equipped and had a remote reservoir on the firewall that fed the low mounted master cyl. Basically an updated carryover from the prior frame mounted master cyl system. Worked like a charm and I never heard of a failure among the Stude crowd.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 18:54
|
|||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I had the same system on my 65 Mercedes 230S finback model and it never caused me any grief either.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 19:05
|
|||
______________________________________________
Dave |
||||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't recall any problems with the Hydrovac either. One difference -- at least in the Studebaker version -- it was conventional piston/cup hydraulics not the displacement ram.
I did find another ram type unit and that was used on "some" 53-4 Buick applications. Don't know who actually made it but it is labeled as Buick. Neither it nor the Moraine version of the BTV (also listed as used in various Buicks and other GM as well as BTVs) has the same compensator valve setup as the Bendix. The fact that Buick/Moraine copied the basic ram principal but not the compensator valve might say something. Since GM seemed to mix these things up quite a bit using one unit part of a year, another the rest, and a different one the next makes me wonder if they had supply problems or operational problems.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 19:50
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
iirc, the Moraine unit used in the 53 Buick got its own chapter in Nader's book "Unsafe at any speed". Anybody have a copy?
Of course anythings Nader dislikes tends to awaken warm and tender affection in me.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 21:09
|
|||
|
Re: BTV rebuild kit concerns check your compensator vale
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Two copies on eBay rite now for about $9ine.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Ralph-Nader-Unsafe-Any-Speed-1966-/230551623238?pt=US_Nonfiction_Book&hash=item35adf29646 Never thot i'd be referenceing that book let alone promoting a sale of it. But in view of GM's disgrace over the last 10 years it's too bad Nader doesn't make a strong comeback and fold them for good.
Posted on: 2010/11/23 21:31
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Register To PostTopic is Locked