Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
118 user(s) are online (105 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 5
Guests: 113

Alvin14, Owen_Dyneto, Ernie Vitucci, TxGoat, BigKev, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal




1951 288 Packard Valve Clearance Notes: What is the minimal clearance?
#1
Home away from home
Home away from home

kunzea
See User information
Measurements below are at cylinder 2 prior to surfacing.

Highest edge exhaust valve above block: .3475

Head surface plus straight edge to cylinder cavity: .4945

Straight edge: .0750

Used head gasket: .0600

Clearance with straight edge: .4945 - .3475 = .147

Clearance with used head gasket: .132

Minimal clearance: ?

Posted on: 6/4 11:35
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1951 288 Packard Valve Clearance Notes: What is the minimal clearance?
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home

Packard Don
See User information
There are no specifications for that and the question has come up here many times. Maybe a search will pull up one o the others including one from just a week or so ago.

Posted on: 6/4 11:43
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1951 288 Packard Valve Clearance Notes: What is the minimal clearance?
#3
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
I cannot answer your question either and Don is correct that Packard did not give clearance specs. Aside from valve sizes and open/close timing the only other spec they shared was valve lift which for 51 was .342 on all engines.

Somewhere on the forum the original post for this head thickness info will be found. In 2014 a post was made regarding measured head thickness. Silly me saved the info but neglected to note who the author was. From the way it is written and the magic basement reference I suspect it was Ross but if not I hope the actual author will claim credit again..

You might be able to take a look at your head and see what is mentioned regarding broach marks on unmilled heads. If not perhaps you can measure your head and possibly get a good feel if it has already been milled and doing it once more might be too much. If you have already lost thickness I would be extremely careful on having any more milling done. You can also do the clay test which may be mentioned in the earlier post of a week or so ago that Don referenced. That test will give you a fair estimate of how much actual clearance you are dealing with.


This cylinder head question comes up over and over so I did a little research in the inventory:

I wandered through the magic basement and measured every cylinder head I could find that I was reasonably sure had never been milled. They ALL measured 1.781" thick, or if you prefer 1/32 over 1 3/4. These were all 48-54. So that seems to be the stock thickness. The 359 heads are another matter, and I didn't have any to measure.

Further, it turns out there is an easy way to tell it they have been milled. All the untouched heads showed broach marks; that is they were not cut flat with a rotary cutter, but were rather dragged under a highly glorified file to flatten them. This can be seen by the longitudinal scratches from this process. If milled, you will probably see circular marks.

And about milling heads to "true them up". I only do it if there is erosion or other damage.
These heads are actually quite flexible. I supported a head by its ends on my Bridgeport's table and placed an indicator in the middle. I can flex the head .002 with my fingers. Those 38 nuts are going to pull out any reasonable amount of warpage.

Posted on: 6/4 13:57
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: 1951 288 Packard Valve Clearance Notes: What is the minimal clearance?
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

Pgh Ultramatic
See User information
Quote:

HH56 wrote:
In 2014 a post was made regarding measured head thickness.


I likewise suspected it was Ross

packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb ... 4093&post_id=143624#forumpost143624

Posted on: 6/4 14:30
1955 400 | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Deluxe | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Super Panama | Registry
Email (Parts/service inquiries only, please. Post all questions on the forum.)
service@ultramatic.info
 Top  Print   
 









- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved