Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wow, it would seem that you have certainly covered all your bases when rebuilding your engine, and also in all your testing to discover the source of the problem.
That your pressure tests are good is perplexing, I would have thought one of those would have failed. And that magnafluxing didn't show anything is perplexing as well. I know I'm not telling you anything new! I would seem that there is a crack that opens when the engine is hot, and that maybe the combination of that, and the cooling system being under pressure it's able to push coolant into the oil, but where is this occurring???? Could this be occurring at the valve guides? Are they in the water jacket? Hopefully someone has some better ideas for you. I'll be curious to know what the fix is and hoping that you don't have to look for a different block.
Posted on: Today 10:10
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Slatewood
The good news is perhaps there may not be anything wrong with the engine. Unless you have installed a coolant recovery tank every time you top-off the coolant level you reset a process where the liquid will seek the same volume as the radiator/engine. You likely start with the prescribed volume cold/cool, but once the coolant warms the pressure rises, the cap opens and some liquid is expelled. Without a ‘catch-can’ once the liquid cools the cap vacuum feature opens and air is drawn into the system. I have been led to believe that as long as the liquid covers the ‘tubes’ the system has a sufficient level. I would top-off the level and warm the engine to full operating temperature, plus a little bit of idling in the garage. Let the engine completely cool (maybe the next morning), and determine the coolant level. Do not add coolant unless you can see the tube tops are dry. Repeat the process of using the car, idle a bit, allow a full cool-down, and recheck the coolant level. The difference between the two level checks is likely the amount of coolant the engine used/leaked. My bet the thermal expansion of the fluid has masked that true usage. Remember every time the coolant temperature hits a new high, some amount of fluid will be expelled. Insert my ‘war story’ of the big puddle of water under Brand X every time I used it! That is until I stopped over filling it. dp
Posted on: Today 11:13
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just FYI if it an overfill issue with the "topping off", Packard states the radiator maximum fill level should be approximately 1 inch below the bottom of the filler neck which would be an inch below the lower rim or pressure sealing surface. Any higher than that and Packard says coolant can be expelled out of the overflow tube when the engine is warm.
Posted on: Today 12:06
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() ![]() |
It has lost water 3 or 4 times the last time I marked the distill water jug where it was and filled back to that level it was 14 oz . "I never put coolant in it since I have worked these type of engines in my Ag days at Allis Chalmers plus several other tractor manufacture that used this type of head gasket. We always ran water until we had no leaks and retorqued the head hot. We had a Ford tractor that had to bored oversized for pistons that once it was back together and found it was getting water in the oil plus white smoke. We were very certain we had a leak , dropped the oil pan and put pressure in the radiator you you could see it spraying out a pin hole "porosity" from being bored oversized. My engine is not that obvious Thanks for everyones input I hope My machine shop guy and I find something.
Posted on: Today 12:29
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a feeling that nothing is wrong with it. It is normal for a car with a full radiator to displace some water as it warms up. If you replace the water after the engine cools off it will do the same thing again. A small amount of water in the oil pan could be from normal condensation and short run periods, and the "smoke" at the oil filler pipe and crankcase vent tube would be normal with a new engine and it would be normal for it to diminish after some run time as the rings seat. An engine that is leaking water into a combustion chamber will usually run poorly and emit steam and excess condensate water at the tailpipe. Bubbles may also appear in the radiator. Any significant leakage can cause the engine to lock up after sitting overnight.Carefully assembling the engine with new gaskets and properly torquing and re-torquing the head should prevent any problems. Most cars will run with the coolant level in the radiator at least an inch or more below the bottom of the filler neck. You will never be able to keep the radiator completely full of water unless install an overflow tank properly, and there is absolutely no need to do that.
Posted on: Today 13:15
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Slatewood
When you say "some" water drained out of the oil pan, how much are we talking about? A tablespoon? A couple of cups? I may have misunderstood, but I got the impression it was a considerable amount, which to me is a major concern. Others don't seem to be as concerned, which made me wonder if I was missing something.
Posted on: Today 14:58
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The first time I decided to check the water level it was about !/4 of a inch down in the radiator not to worried it had only been on two short drives about 2 miles or less each time. I have left the hood off so I could look at the engine for any problems leaks blowby and water coming out the over flow tube and saw noething checking it two or three times each trip. I also had filled it about 1 inch below the seal for the cap so it should not have boiled any out. It was about day three or four after a few more short trips it seamed to get lower thats when I jacked it up and drained the oil its hard to catch just the water but it was over a cup full 8 oz at least. Then I started doing all the checks I talked about in my last post as for checking cylinder pressure and putting pressure in the coolant system . The rest of that day and then over night , I was sure when I came out the next morning the pressure would have dropped off and their would be some water in the drain pan under the oil pan with the plug removed. I was shocked to see no pressure had been lost and no water was in the clean drain pan.
Posted on: Today 19:43
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am far more armchair than mechanic, but I did experience a fresh rebuild problem once with valve guides that were not completely seated, putting water in the manifold(exhaust in my case if I recall from 20 years ago...). Used a magic ceramic block sealer and all was good, happily ever after.
radiator level is never at top once run - water expands more than you think... Good Luck!
Posted on: Today 21:00
|
|||
|
Re: 1950 packard 288 engine just rebuilt now has water in the oil
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Webmaster
![]() ![]() ![]() |
It could have a small crack or a porous hole in a cylinder wall that only shows when a piston is at a certain positon. You may need to repeat the test with the crank turned to different positions.
If it leaking into the oil then I'd imagine it could happen when the piston is nearier the top of cylinder with a leak happening in the cylinder wall below the level of the piston rings. When the positon is in a lower positon, the rings could be temporarily sealing the leak. Hence the retesting with the crank at different positions. Just a theory.
Posted on: Today 21:05
|
|||
-BigKev
1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog 1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog |
||||
|