Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some gas tanks have an independent vent tube that runs along side of the filler neck. If a leak is in the vent tube or filler tube high enuf to disallow fuel leakage it mite allow water seapage from rear tire spary during rain.
At this point we need to eleminate or confirm the water issue as a possibility or the vapour lock. The electric fuel pump pushing fuel or fuel/water/debris on thru the sytem is only a band-aid for both problems.
Posted on: 2009/6/28 9:40
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Trog writes:
"I assumed it to be vapor lock given the new tank, blown out lines, and filter at the back." Good control unit for diagnosis. If the problem is fuel then it's either vapour lock or water. Wonder if there is water from recent refueling???
Posted on: 2009/6/28 9:51
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not ready to place blame anywhere in particular at this point. But i'm not convinced of vapor lock either.
As for the fuel suppliers i agree that we never really know where the fuel comes from. Maverick suppliers dumping at nite and so on and so-forth. I am suspicious about individual gas stations and their susceptibility to rain gathering in their parking lot and running into the holding tanks under the ground or fractures in the holding tanks.
Posted on: 2009/6/28 10:15
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Guess rainwater is possible but would believe condensation more likely--believe most tanks pretty well capped. Don't know about Tennessee, but here in most parts of the state, because of the old tanks leaking MTBE (or somesuch name) and contaminating groundwater, the EPA forced gas stations to remove old underground tanks, replace with ones above ground or if under, something that won't corrode etc. If they didn't do that, had to close down AND remove tanks. New tanks have monitoring equipt, and because of air resources board, vapor recovery systems in some counties--so running rainwater or seepage would be low on the list of problems here--(the drought doesn't help either). Interestingly, none of this would have taken place if air resources and EPA hadn't forced them to sell the MTBE (which turns out to be a potent carcinogen) gas in the first place as a way to cut pollution.
Posted on: 2009/6/28 10:34
|
|||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm thinking that HH56's fuel/water seperator is the best idea so far. What if i cheat and just use a spare cARTER glass bowl filter mounted near the tank. Just need to come up with some kind of stone shield for the glass bowl and carry extra cork gaskets.
Posted on: 2009/6/28 11:32
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Just need to come up with some kind of stone shield for the glass bowl and carry extra cork gaskets. I wouldn't use cork gaskets anywhere modern fuel is involved.
Posted on: 2009/6/28 14:09
|
|||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Webmaster
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here is my two cents.
I really think a marginal mechanical fuel pump can be the cause of a lot of the phantom vapor lock issues. It the valve seals are getting old, or there is grit imbedded in the sealing surfaces, or a partial clogged inlet screen, then the fuel pressure that it can both deliver to the carb, and the vacuum it can draw on the fuel line may be affected. So on normal/cool days it runs fine as the marginal pump doesn't have to try to overcome any possible issues with the fuel becoming vaporized in the line. But on hot days when the vapor issue in the fuel arrises, the marginal pump cannot over come that. Where as a good fuel pump can over come that issue because of the higher fuel pressure, vacuum it can generate. Explains why on two of the exact same models running the same fuel that one is having the problem and the other may not. The lower the fuel pressure the higher the chances of vapor lock are.
Posted on: 2009/6/28 14:18
|
|||
-BigKev
1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog 1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog |
||||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Ethanol is the one commonly distilled from corn or biomass and which is used in gasoline by Federal requirement an an oxygenate (source of oxygen), isopropanol is the one which we used to buy as "dry gas"."
Should we expect Ethanol to be significanlty less effective as a "dry gas" than isopropanol??? OR, let me pose the question a different way: Should we expect long term use of Ethanol gasoline, as delivered from the gas station pump, to keep our automobile fuel system void of water and condensation?????
Posted on: 2009/6/30 6:38
|
|||
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245 |
||||
|
Re: glass fuel bowl observation
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Probably no, and yes, respectively, assuming you don't get really heavily water-contaminated gasoline, and/or exceptional amounts of condensation.
Posted on: 2009/6/30 7:40
|
|||
|