Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
164 user(s) are online (111 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 164

more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 ... 15 16 17 (18) 19 20 21 ... 31 »

Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
Alright Gentlemen.

Lets clean it up , stop the bickering and move on before it turns into

Posted on: 2009/11/25 19:48
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
What??? I leave the house for the 6 hours and miss all of the fun???? How do u all know when i'm 'out of pocket' anyway????? Gufwah hah hah ha ha ha.

Posted on: 2009/11/25 22:26
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Kev writes:
"I have always thought that a new master cylinder casting in the same outward cosmetic shape, but new convention internal design would be a no brainer and make everyone happy"

YES! SUPERB idea.

QUite possibly an original casting could be sleeved and fitted with a cup type piston.

Posted on: 2009/11/25 22:28
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Thanks for getting back to us Packard34. we're all glad that u are willing to do some forensics on this problem.

Posted on: 2009/11/25 22:32
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Home away from home
Home away from home

kens53clip
See User information
Sorry if anyone objects to my saying a dual master cylinder is a backup brake system. All I know is that is with a dual master cylinder it is possible that the rear brakes may stop you even if the front brakes do not, or vice versa. In addition to BTV and the emergency brake my Packard has a special emergency braking device. It is called shoe leather. You stick your feet through the rusted out floorboard and press your feet down very hard on the road. It is very inefficient but it is better than nothing!
Ken

Posted on: 2009/11/27 10:08
Ken
53 Clipper Deluxe 4 Dr.

Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
Guess shoe leather works--just look out for the potholes. Wasn't it Hudson that kept a true back up brake system for a few years. Hydraulic for normal but if that failed, they still had the mechanical linkage in place as a backup.

Posted on: 2009/11/27 10:23
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
Actually the Hudson system was clever and inexpensive; if the hydraulics failed, just before the pedal hit the floorboards, it engaged the parking brake cables. Since your foot was already on the pedal, it saved all that "oh s..., what do I do now?" reflex and reaction time, and also gave the better mechanical advantage of your foot rather than your arm.

The one object lesson in the beginning of this thread which I hope we've all picked up on is, don't drive with an inoperative hand brake. All that damage might have been averted.

PS - though I've never had occasion to use it in an emergency, on each car I've owned I've cautiously applied the hand/parking brake while moving to get a sense of the stopping power, and I would recommend everyone do this in some isolated, safe stretch of pavement or parking lot. Of course the 1936 and back Packard mechanical brake systems are the best in this regard as they engage the brakes on all 4 wheels, but then again mechanical brake systems like the Classics used are the least likely of any brake system to have a complete failure.

Posted on: 2009/11/27 10:32
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Home away from home
Home away from home

mikec
See User information
Was the later, and similar, Delco Morrain unit any better? reading through this thread i see mention of the BTV being replaced later with a similar DM unit. Would one of these be an acceptible substitue? close enough in outside appearence, mounting location and leverage?

Posted on: 2009/11/28 21:58
Daily Driver:
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Home away from home
Home away from home

Eric Boyle
See User information
....Offensive posts removed....

Posted on: 2009/11/28 22:16
 Top  Print   
 


Re: DO NOT TRUST BTV
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Jed Sheehan
See User information
Eric,
I was looking through my parts book and found the attached pictures of the '56 manual brake setup. Can this brake pedal setup be installed in a '56 400? If so, then it looks like a small MC with remote booster and reservoir could be installed in the same location as the manual brake MC.

Having never seen a '56 manual brake setup I'm wondering if there's other issues with installing the manual brake pedal setup. Is there a similar panel where the BTV comes through the floor? Or does the manual brake pedal just go through a hole in the floor? Is there a component of the torsion level system mounted in this area of the frame that would preclude me from using this setup?

This looks too easy.

Attach file:



jpg  (34.93 KB)
1986_4b2e24c712d69.jpg 640X480 px

jpg  (33.07 KB)
1986_4b2e24f25e5a4.jpg 640X480 px

Posted on: 2009/12/20 8:24
Jed
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 ... 15 16 17 (18) 19 20 21 ... 31 »




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved