Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
194 user(s) are online (133 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 3
Guests: 191

Packard Don, JohnCB, TxGoat, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



(1) 2 »

Would you use this?
#1
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Randy Berger
See User information

Posted on: 2013/12/31 18:59
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#2
Home away from home
Home away from home

bobp
See User information
Assuming the car hasn't fallen, how does one remove the wheel?? See what happens when you legalize certain smokes.

Posted on: 2013/12/31 19:12
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#3
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
Quote:

randy berger wrote:
Would you use this tool?

Only if I had a death wish. I believe that to be one of the most insane ideas to ever come from an era where many were competing for the prize of most stupid idea --

I believe the description said you had to place some kind of stand under the car and then remove the jack to remove the tire. Who in their right mind would try to position something under a car with only that holding it up and then do it all again to remove the blocking when the new tire was on.

Posted on: 2013/12/31 19:15
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#4
Home away from home
Home away from home

Dell
See User information
it is correct and i would love to have one just to be able to say i have the correct jack for my 42. have a great new year. dell

Posted on: 2013/12/31 19:38

35-1200 touring sedan
42-110 convertible coupe
48-2293 station sedan
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#5
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Uhhhhh. Wait a minute. Is such a jack actualy documented anywhere by any Packatd authority??? The directions for use as outlined in eBay auction will not work.

Posted on: 2013/12/31 21:44
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#6
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
If the jack is correct then is it correct for 42 ONLY???? If so then did very early 42's ( built prior to december) have a jack similar to pre 42's????

Posted on: 2013/12/31 21:51
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#7
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Owen_Dyneto
See User information
According to the Reedy & Shaub book "Packard Automobile Company - Tools and Jacks", the rim jack (with accompanying jackstand) was supplied in 1941 and 1942.

Posted on: 2013/12/31 23:53
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#8
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Randy Berger
See User information
Thank you Dave, for the authentication.
Packard engineers must have been smoking some potent weed.

Posted on: 2014/1/1 1:24
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#9
Home away from home
Home away from home

Guscha
See User information
Quote:
Thank you Dave, for the authentication...


Wait a minute Randy, Dave's source authenticated the jack itself but (until now) we don't know how to use it as required by the Packard usage rules.

The seller says: "I NEVER KNEW HOW THIS JACK WAS USED UNTIL I FINELY SAW ONE ON EBAY, ASKED SOME QUESTIONS AND THEN KNEW..."

Somebody in ebay doesn't usually have the prerogative of interpretation to convince you that Packard offered dangerous scrap.
Take a look at pic 1. What was the reason to start the gearing from the bottom?

Attach file:



jpg  (14.72 KB)
757_52c3f8bf24040.jpg 500X497 px

jpg  (21.93 KB)
757_52c3f8cd24a73.jpg 500X431 px

Posted on: 2014/1/1 6:23
The story of ZIS-110, ZIS-115, ZIL-111 & Chaika GAZ-13 on www.guscha.de
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Would you use this?
#10
Home away from home
Home away from home

PackardV8
See User information
Gearing from the bottom:
The geared post was most likely cut from a longer length of mfg'd stock.

Safety issues notwithstsanding i doubt the effectiveness of the jack.
Once jack stand is in place under the car then wheel will drop to ground as jack is removed.

Probably just marginal effectiveness on a good level concrete floor at best.

Posted on: 2014/1/1 8:20
VAPOR LOCK demystified: See paragraph SEVEN of PMCC documentaion as listed in post #11 of the following thread:f
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=7245
 Top  Print   
 




(1) 2 »




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved