Re: 1941 Packard One-Twenty
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
looks like it has the color tone interior trim (dash painted, colored plastic) which was in my opinion an attractive option. be aware that some parts interchange between 110-120-160(swb) - the crew here can help with specifics.
Posted on: 2011/9/6 9:58
|
|||
|
Re: Labor Day
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
sorry anglophiles, but I'm not a fan of badge bars - sort of a charm bracelet for cars. I'm pretty sure West will have my back on this.
Posted on: 2011/9/6 7:55
|
|||
|
Re: 1938 1601 (Eight aka 120) fender welt and air cleaner bracket
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
automotive diagnosis is loose nut behiind the steering wheel
Posted on: 2011/9/1 8:49
|
|||
|
Re: New concept car (not Packard)
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
in case you needed it after the XLR and CTS coupe, further proof that Cadillac stylists have no sense of proportion
Posted on: 2011/8/22 13:37
|
|||
|
Re: '57 Packard What-If based on Turnpike Cruiser
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
roof changes out of the budget! Think of the Clipper - bathtub. The main section (cowl-roof-door openings-floor pan) needs to stay common to save money. The C-pillar look can be changed with an add on piece, but the same structure is underneath. Cadillac and Imperial were still on light pillars, T-Bird/Lincoln not. Later most people went to formal heavy c-pillar. I think after the 58 Mercury, the next rebody is too much a Ford and not enough a Lincoln to share
I don't think you can go cost no object on the fittings- otherwise you end up with a Continental Mk II - 10k$, few sales and loosing money on every one. I like the Chrysler-based approach because the drive train is I feel superior to Ford's, but I agree that Ford's styling (some Packard people did go to Ford)is more compatible.
Posted on: 2011/8/18 13:51
|
|||
|
Re: '57 Packard What-If based on Turnpike Cruiser
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
have to have 2 differences of opinion - I think the 25% over Lincoln premise is rapid market death. Competitive with Cadillac's equivalent model.
The last Mercury-based one looks like a Ford (as the Mercury does) - not a luxury car. The leading edge of the headlights/fenders is very soft, no tension in the line. I'm biased becaused I never liked the styling of that car. I think the full length trim from 55/56 is a styling theme that is very adaptable and gives the car a longer and smoother look. The long color stripe idea was used on Chevy for a while. In the tooling budget ,a different hood from the "donor" to carry back whatever grill shoulders exist is a priority (and not too difficule as it's not a deep draw. If there's a desire to disguise the shared shell, C pillar skin changes over the same structure are also easy.
Posted on: 2011/8/18 9:55
|
|||
|
Re: 1948 SUPER 8 DOOR MOLDINGS NEEDED
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
assume you mean the part low on the door. Try Sandy Chirco, Tuscon Packard. It's the same on 2-dr fastbacks and convertibles.
Posted on: 2011/8/17 19:31
|
|||
|
Re: '57 Packard What-If based on Turnpike Cruiser
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
cleaning up the Merc's mish-mash of side lines helps. For the 400, how about stainless roof panels above the doors like Imperial used. An echo of the Predictor's tambours
Posted on: 2011/8/12 15:02
|
|||
|
Re: 1957 Packards, Predictor Style
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
mules/prototypes being scrapped has I think to do with the tax laws. they are exempt from taxes on saleable vehicles but must be destroyed to prevent their sale.
Posted on: 2011/8/12 13:51
|
|||
|