Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Re your #2, the 428408 is a casting number, from a single casting several different part numbers could be made. The 288 STD 327 AT means the head was intended for the 288 engine with standard transmission and the 327 with automatic transmission.
Re your #4, the petcock is not original. Re your #5, the blue smoke indicates some engine wear, probably rings but could also be intake valve guides. These engines when new or in good condition shouldn't make visible smoke.
Posted on: 2009/9/24 20:25
|
|||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Thanks Owen for your input. Since the block says 288 STD, does that mean it is not the correct engine for my car? I have an automatic. The engine number is hard to read, but I can make out the beginning as J2029... which puts it as correct for the year according to the chart on this website.
I also notice smoke comes from the oil filler when the motor heats up some. Is this normal or indicitive of bad rings or valves? Any ideas what purpose the petcock would be for? Wipers work (kind of...they wipe outward and then get stuck) so it wouldn't be for them...
Posted on: 2009/9/24 20:57
|
|||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Webmaster
|
The head was probably swapped out at some point. My engine is a 327 block with a 288 AT head on it.
Where on the actual block does it say 288 STD?
Posted on: 2009/9/24 21:42
|
|||
-BigKev
1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog 1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog |
||||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
It says 288 STD 327 AT on the cylinder head. It is cast in just like "Packard" is on it. The engine number on the block itself indicates it is a 288 from 1951. I guess that means the block is original, but the head is not?
Posted on: 2009/9/25 7:02
|
|||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
51Packard, 1951 288 cu. in. engines had numbers in the J200000 series. Whether the engine numbering sequence started with 001 or 000 differs with various "sources". I believe they started with 001.
There should also be a casting date on the lower part of the engine just above where the oil pan surface is and just ahead of the bell housing. Your engine has a 3 1/2" bore, a 3 3/4" stroke, and develops 135 bhp at 3,600 rpm. The standard compression ratio for your engine and the 327 cu. in. engine is 7.00:1. It would seem that a standard compression ratio head for a 327, if fitted to your 288, would result in a lower than 7.00:1 ratio. A high compression head was offered in 1952 that was 7.50:1 and boosted the bhp to 138 at 3,600 rpm.
Posted on: 2009/9/25 8:51
|
|||
We move toward
And make happen What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer) |
||||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
51 Packard,
If your 51 engine is like my 53 engine, #3 has the date the engine was made. Ken
Posted on: 2009/9/25 18:09
|
|||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
What advantage would there be using a standard 288 head on one with an automatic? Higher compression is better, right?
The smoke I notice from the car cannot be seen coming from the tailpipe. You see it lofting in the air when the sun hits it. Maybe I could get away with just replacing the rings? A while ago I did a compression test and got 120 on each cylinder. What would be considered good? Can you change the rings without removing the motor from the car or the cylinder head? I would hate to break one of the 100 studs on the top of the cylinder head. My dad told me that back in the day they would pull the piston from the oil pan to change the rings. I would think the crankshaft would get in the way. I took another look at the petcock on the intake. It definitely looks newer than the rest of the car. What purpose could it have served? Is the casting date on the drivers side or passenger side? Can you see it from above or do you need to look from underneath? Sorry for the rookie questions. I don't know a lot about motors.
Posted on: 2009/9/25 18:10
|
|||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
My dad told me that back in the day they would pull the piston from the oil pan to change the rings. I would think the crankshaft would get in the way. You can do that on a Hudson straight eight, but not a Packard. You have to pull the head.
Posted on: 2009/9/25 19:44
|
|||
|
Re: Engine Number Questions & Proper Running & Intake Manifold
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Casting date on lower right-hand side of engine just above bottom of engine and in front of bell housing. Casting date on cylinder head is for cylinder head, not engine.
Posted on: 2009/9/25 20:52
|
|||
We move toward
And make happen What occupies our mind... (W. Scherer) |
||||
|