Packard Forum Index » Post-War (1946-54)

In lieu of getting the proper Packard gray from Hirsch or Kanter, several have used a Massey-Ferguson tractor engine paint. Here is an example and maybe someone can fill in the blanks. Last time I was in Tractor Supply I noticed there was more than one shade so not sure which one was chosen or is most correct.packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb ... .php?post_id=107060#forumpost107060

Here's what the Kanter gray looks like. I realize that due to lighting, computer screen differences, blah, blah, blah... that no two people are seeing the exact shade of gray that came out of the can but it's a good general idea of the Kanter version of Packard Engine Gray. There are several photos in NotSoBigKevs project blog showing the Hirsch gray (very similar if not the same).

Attach file:

---

  (74.32 KB)

I notice a quart of Packard Green engine paint for sale at this link

ebay.com/itm/af53-Kanter-1-QT-Auto-High- ... ssories&hash=item3cd5f78d82&vxp=mtr

that states 1920 to 1950, may help explain green engines which would include the way my 48 was painted.

I think it comes down to this in regards to the straight eight motors:

All 288/327 Motor (Regardless of Year) - Packard Grey

356 and all other motors prior to the 288/327 motors - Packard Green

1954 359 Motor - Bronze

So there is an overlap in 1948-1950 where 356s were green, and the 327s/288s were grey. I think this is where all the confusion started from.

Kanter's description is correct for the 356 motors, just not the 327/288 motors.

This thread wasn't intended to question what color the engines should be as my understanding was the same as O_D's response in post #3. The intent was to try and discover why so many engines that should be gray ended up green. I think Howard's response in post #2 is probably the best answer to that question.

Anyway, based on the on-line photos available, and the responses to this thread, approximately 31% of those observed/reported 22nd/23rd series engines ended up green. This is not statistically significant due to the small sample but I found it interesting anyway. Thanks to all that responded.