Hello and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
237 user(s) are online (145 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 235

DJP-37-120, John Newton, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2) 3 »

Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#11
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Trog
See User information
That tank looks a little different than mine. My pickup tube/sending unit is on the front on a slight slope whereas it appears yours is back on the tank and even (hard to see it) attached with screws? Your looks longer than mine but that just might be the photo angle.

Posted on: 2009/5/1 22:17
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#12
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
This may explain the difference in tanks. Maybe some engineer had to work on one like Mal's and found out it was a PIA.

Attach file:



jpg  (10.14 KB)
209_49fbbedec9653.jpg 406X135 px

Posted on: 2009/5/1 22:32
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#13
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Ozstatman
See User information
Quote:
Trog wrote: That tank looks a little different than mine. My pickup tube/sending unit is on the front on a slight slope whereas it appears yours is back on the tank and even (hard to see it) attached with screws? Your looks longer than mine but that just might be the photo angle.

Couple of further pic's of the 41 120's tank. Pickup tube/sending unit is on top of tank forward of centre on the upper flat surface, behind the dish on the upper front, and is attached by 5 screws. I'd imagine length would be the same.

Quote:
HH56 wrote: This may explain the difference in tanks. Maybe some engineer had to work on one like Mal's and found out it was a PIA.

Howard,

It is a PIA! But from the parts book it looks like the 41 tanks for the 120(1901) was a completely different tank to that for earlier years.

I've included some pic's of the replacement aluminium tank that Wade had fabricated for his '37 120 but they don't really tell the story. I never lined up the '37 and '41 tanks and compared them. If the old '37 tank is still around I'll have another look it next week.

EDIT - Caption on 5th pic should be 358017.......

Attach file:



jpg  (18.70 KB)
226_49fbcac16895a.jpg 384X512 px

jpg  (31.72 KB)
226_49fbcad38a2e5.jpg 640X480 px

jpg  (31.94 KB)
226_49fbcae210b81.jpg 640X480 px

jpg  (31.22 KB)
226_49fbd3fcc6975.jpg 640X480 px

jpg  (17.67 KB)
226_49fbd4084174e.jpg 384X512 px

jpg  (37.06 KB)
226_49fbd4da60461.jpg 640X480 px

Posted on: 2009/5/2 0:04
Mal
/o[]o\
====

Bowral, Southern Highlands of NSW, Australia
"Out of chaos comes order" - Nietzsche.

1938 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

1941 One-Twenty Club Coupe - SOLD

1948 Super Eight Limo, chassis RHD - SOLD

1950 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

What's this?
Put your Packard in the Packard Vehicle Registry!
Here's how!
Any questions - PM or email me at ozstatman@gmail.com
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#14
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Ozstatman
See User information
Quote:
Trog wrote:........ Both sending unit and gauge on mine are faulty and while the sending unit/pickup tube combo is available by exchange, it is I think $175 or more. The gauge I just do not see me under that dash with the clutch pedal in my neck trying to remove it.

There's an Ammeter/Gas Gauge for a '41 120 on eBay now -

https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/reply.php?forum=1&topic_id=2659&viewmode=flat&order=ASC&start=0&post_id=27572

But we removed the complete dash in order to access everything there for re-wiring. Even that was a struggle.

Regarding the sending unit, it should probably work after a thorough cleaning. NOTE Getting a good ground is critical to it's operation.

Posted on: 2009/5/2 5:02
Mal
/o[]o\
====

Bowral, Southern Highlands of NSW, Australia
"Out of chaos comes order" - Nietzsche.

1938 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

1941 One-Twenty Club Coupe - SOLD

1948 Super Eight Limo, chassis RHD - SOLD

1950 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

What's this?
Put your Packard in the Packard Vehicle Registry!
Here's how!
Any questions - PM or email me at ozstatman@gmail.com
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#15
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Trog
See User information
I'm going to avoid removing the dash. That did that on a '51 Frazer and it was no fun getting it back on. If I can find a gauge rather cheaply, I'll just hang it up under the dash for once-in-a-while looksee. I did clean the sending unit real well, but get no response from it all with a voltmeter. When I got the car the dash gauge would stick on 1/2. This car was converted to 12V, so unsure the effect of that. That's very useful information on the two different tanks.

Posted on: 2009/5/2 7:49
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#16
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Trog
See User information
The '37 looks very much like the '41 120 picture, certainly different from mine.

Posted on: 2009/5/2 7:52
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#17
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Trog
See User information
https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=732&forum=2&post_id=27596#forumpost27596

My friend Keith sent me an email with this prior forum posting. Have to find out the cost.

Posted on: 2009/5/2 7:55
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#18
Webmaster
Webmaster

BigKev
See User information
If I remember right those stainless tanks were over $1,000.

The maker used to post on here all the time, but quickly wore out his welcome.

Posted on: 2009/5/2 15:22
-BigKev


1954 Packard Clipper Deluxe Touring Sedan -> Registry | Project Blog

1937 Packard 115-C Convertible Coupe -> Registry | Project Blog
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#19
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Ozstatman
See User information
Quote:
BigKev wrote: If I remember right those stainless tanks were over $1,000. The maker used to post on here all the time, but quickly wore out his welcome.

Kev,

You do remember rightly, here's a relevant thread together with couple of it's posts.

https://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1291&forum=4&post_id=13550#forumpost13550

Quote:
packprince wrote: That is what I like "cheap Bast$&ds" I make a very high quality stanless steel take for a very quality car, and all you cheapo's worry about a few bucks. The crap you dump in your tank ends up in Carb. I have posted pic's and info in forums and have sold 6 tanks to people who were tired of dicking with this problem. UNREAL


Quote:
BigKev wrote: PackPrince....lets tone it down a bit. Not sure if you are having a bad day or what.
Not all of us have the luxury of spending $1,000 on a new tank. If someone does, then great that is then probably the best solution for them. I know I dont have that kind of extra scratch laying around. But I may be able to come up with $200 to have a rad shop boil it out so I can get my car back on the road.

Posted on: 2009/5/2 15:32
Mal
/o[]o\
====

Bowral, Southern Highlands of NSW, Australia
"Out of chaos comes order" - Nietzsche.

1938 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

1941 One-Twenty Club Coupe - SOLD

1948 Super Eight Limo, chassis RHD - SOLD

1950 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

What's this?
Put your Packard in the Packard Vehicle Registry!
Here's how!
Any questions - PM or email me at ozstatman@gmail.com
 Top  Print   
 


Re: '41 120 Gas Tank
#20
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away

Trog
See User information
I'm with you BK. B4 I paid a $1k, I'd just use a 10-gallon boat tank in the trunk. My Packard ain't no concours trailer queen but an infrequently driven car I like to enjoy time to time and I am confident in the gas tank renu process having had three done (all on Packards, never any of the other orphans). I can appreciate craftsmanship but then I have to look at practicality.

Posted on: 2009/5/2 17:23
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2) 3 »




Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved