Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
And I wonder if the lag in inventory combined with calendar year versus model year overlaps mean the engine could be correct.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but nope, your car has the incorrect engine. The engine for your '5479 was a new engine just for the '54 senior cars.
Posted on: 2015/12/15 8:51
|
|||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
359?? I assume the 359 is a bore and stroked version of the 9 main bearing 327? If it is and since it was bored out .062" already (1/16"), was there a limit on over boring it for rebuilding the engine?
John
Posted on: 2015/12/15 11:41
|
|||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Factory service pistons for the 359 were available up to and including 0.040" oversize, same as for all 48-54 engines. More than likely different cores were used when casting the 359 block than were used for the 327 9-main block.
Posted on: 2015/12/15 12:10
|
|||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
Where can I find the engine number lookup?
Posted on: 2015/12/15 12:49
|
|||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
G'day mcclusk,
to PackardInfo and I invite you to include your '54 Convertible Coupe in the Packard Owner's Registry. And, Bryce, in the Literature and Manuals Section, scroll down to Misc Packard Information(bottom right) and click on Packard Engine Serial Number Reference then open up the actual Packard Engine Serial Number Reference.
Posted on: 2015/12/15 13:10
|
|||
Mal
/o[]o\ ==== Bowral, Southern Highlands of NSW, Australia "Out of chaos comes order" - Nietzsche. 1938 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD 1941 One-Twenty Club Coupe - SOLD 1948 Super Eight Limo, chassis RHD - SOLD 1950 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD What's this? Put your Packard in the Packard Vehicle Registry! Here's how! Any questions - PM or email me at ozstatman@gmail.com |
||||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Would be interesting to know the reason for the engine change. I believe the 359 blocks were as robust as any other Packard engine but I'm wondering if the aluminum head gave up and the engine was replaced because of something that caused.
Lots of 359 blocks are running around with 327 or 288 heads -- although I believe it has been mentioned that they don't like some of the resulting compression ratios all that much..
Posted on: 2015/12/15 13:29
|
|||
Howard
|
||||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Wasn't the aluminum head a problem on the 359 engine over time from corrosion?
John
Posted on: 2015/12/15 16:39
|
|||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Yes, the aluminum head did prove troublesome in later years, probably as much from cracks thru spark plug holes as corrosion. Yet surprisingly there are still a fair number of 54 seniors still happily touring with their aluminum heads.
Posted on: 2015/12/15 18:14
|
|||
|
Re: 1954 Chassis # and 1953 Engine #
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
They were pretty high compression I believe, something like 8.7 to one. Pretty good for a flat head engine anyway.
John
Posted on: 2015/12/15 20:42
|
|||
|