Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
Actually, I quite like the Grill.
Posted on: 2011/4/18 1:39
|
|||
Mal
/o[]o\ ==== Bowral, Southern Highlands of NSW, Australia "Out of chaos comes order" - Nietzsche. 1938 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD 1941 One-Twenty Club Coupe - SOLD 1948 Super Eight Limo, chassis RHD - SOLD 1950 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD What's this? Put your Packard in the Packard Vehicle Registry! Here's how! Any questions - PM or email me at ozstatman@gmail.com |
||||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
There is a reason Dreisbach and sons Cadillac is no longer in business. This is one of the reasons. Although it made a standard Cadillac look good if parked next to one of these abortions.
Posted on: 2011/4/18 4:18
|
|||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
No doubt about it, this monstrosity is a pimp-mobile!
Posted on: 2011/4/18 11:02
|
|||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I kind of wonder if it was legally called a "Packard." I bet there was an asterisk* somewhere. And the Caddy it's based on is that Seville with the short deck, wasn't it?
*Maybe something like: "Not responsible for authenticity or resale value, if any." I don't want to be mean, but this thing is obviously NOT a labor of love. It's a lousy trick if you ask me. Probably trying to build showroom traffic: "Step right up ladies and gents! Come and see the freak car! It's real! Drive it if you dare!" Now I guess I am getting mean.
Posted on: 2011/4/18 14:21
|
|||
Guy
[b]Not an Expert[/ |
||||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
|
It is a Bayliff, not a Dreisbach and Sons. That was the dealership that distributed them. Not the builder. It is built from a 1980 Sedan DeVille, not a Seville.
And yes, not only did Bayliff have the right to use the name, they purchased and owned the Packard name.
Posted on: 2011/4/20 14:31
|
|||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I own one of these and get many compliments when I drive it.
On the ownership of the Packard name, The Packard Club claims to own it, the guy in Arizona who was going to build a new Packard claimed he owned it, not I see someone says Bayliff owns it. In my opinion it is in the public domain by now so nobody owns it an everybody can use it. Nobody has sued anybody and won but there has been a lot of noise. Time will tell.
Posted on: 2011/4/20 20:42
|
|||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Posted on: 2011/4/20 20:53
|
|||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Forum Ambassador
|
I believe that's the Gullickson prototype. Only 1 made that I know of, it was on view in Cleveland during the 1999 Packard Centennial in Warren OH. The story of the car is well known and has been written about quite a bit, most recently in an issue of PAC's publication which covered all the attempts to revive the Packard vehicle.
The Gullickson car, engineering drawings, tooling etc. were up for auction on eBay not too long ago. It did have a V-12, a conversion of some helicopter or aircraft engine as I recall. There's more to the story, probably best left unsaid.
Posted on: 2011/4/20 21:04
|
|||
|
Re: Anything uglier called a Packard?
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
RE: 32 901's post. That's the Gullickson prototype frpm Arizona that I and Owen D are referring to. Only one was made
Posted on: 2011/4/21 5:34
|
|||
|