Assessment of 1955 Packard Caribbean via Artificial Intelligence.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Hey,
I was goofing with one of the artificial intelligent engines and was asking somewhat random questions. I probed it on different topics that I was interested in. Since I have a 1955 Packard Caribbean I asked it what it knows on the car. It brought up the facts about production numbers for 1955 and stated that there were only 36 produced. I have read at multiple sites/places that the production was 500 units (maybe 499). Even this site states Total Production: 500. Here is what it had to say in 'summary'... Does anyone agree or disagree with this summary? Quote: let me summarize the key points about its production numbers and current value: I asked about its sources for the production numbers and it sited these references... Quote:
Please Let me know your thoughts.
Posted on: 3/26 16:26
|
|||
1955 Packard Caribbean 5588 MDF 92
|
||||
|
Re: Assessment of 1955 Packard Caribbean via Artificial Intelligence.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
I know a lot of older folks (and younger folks) don't quite understand how AI works. Don't worry because even the people that design these don't understand how they work. As a counterexample, no one can tell how an integrated circuit works with the naked eye, but every component in it was in some way designed and configured by a human. This is not the case for AI, which builds its own library of data based on analyzing training materials. Note that I said data, and NOT FACTS.
AI is like a fortune teller. Half of what it tells you is common knowledge, and the other half is made up BS. Only a fool would take its output at face value. Likewise, if you have the knowledge to tell fact from hallucination, then you could have done its job in the first place. There is NO AI that can tell fact from fiction, let alone correctly express any remotely controversial issue without being specifically programmed towards a certain inoffensive, respectful response. Heck, even the best chat bots can't even DO MATH. That should clue you in to its logical prowess (zero). I want to emphasize that none of the above is personal against ZeroCool, as I meant everything generically. But that IS my thoughts and I'm sure you can tell what I think of that summary.
Posted on: 3/26 16:48
|
|||
1955 400 | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Deluxe | Registry | Project Blog 1955 Clipper Super Panama | Registry |
||||
|
Re: Assessment of 1955 Packard Caribbean via Artificial Intelligence.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Quite a regular
|
Lol, after further questioning, the engine recanted most of what it claimed as fact.
I know that if you want to know, ask the man who owns one.
Posted on: 3/26 18:19
|
|||
1955 Packard Caribbean 5588 MDF 92
|
||||
|
Re: Assessment of 1955 Packard Caribbean via Artificial Intelligence.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
The Packard Club's roster of 1955 Packard Caribbean Convertibles has 258 cars registered. Known production serial numbers range from 1001 to 1499, yielding a total production of 500 for this model.
Posted on: 3/26 22:39
|
|||
Don Shields
1933 Eight Model 1002 Seven Passenger Sedan 1954 Convertible |
||||
|
Re: Assessment of 1955 Packard Caribbean via Artificial Intelligence.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Maybe ZeroCool can ask AI to explain the discrepancy!
Posted on: 3/26 23:39
|
|||
|
Re: Assessment of 1955 Packard Caribbean via Artificial Intelligence.
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Home away from home
|
Quote:
...And my personal Caribbean Roster has more. And I have actively been collecting data and info on these cars since at least the 1960s and rode in the very first 1956 Caribbean (a hand-built prototype driven by a Packard engineer) when new in 1955. Of course ridiculous nonsense is expected to come out of asking AI. BUT... don't blame absurd statements of Packard "facts" and "history" solely on AI or whether the person making the enquiry is young OR old. Or being unfamiliar with the scope and operation of AI. Posing any question to infant AI as it is today is a crapshoot at best. However... Try asking the be-all-know-all almighty "wikipedia" about Earle C. Anthony's Packard neon sign... or the one-off Packard Request, for examples. Last time I looked good 'ol wiki was blurting BS about how "several Packard Requests were left sitting on showroom floors, unsellable". Silly hallucination stuff worded as fact. And one can compare good 'ol wiki's oleo nonsense on Earle C. Anthony's Packard neon "history" to the factual story published in The Packard Cormorant magazine. Look it up. Few people do since few know the TPC story was ever published. Few are aware of the expertise in TPC magazine. And of course to go that far means one might actually have to do some real work and dig (OFF of the internet– the old way)... or (clutch the pearls!) actually buy the magazine! Heaven forbid! On wiki... ANYBODY can make up and say anything at all... and get it passed off as fact. And if one goes to the trouble of getting to be a "wiki editor" and goes in and makes factual corrections, some moron can simply get themself also installed as a "wiki editor" and then change the correction BACK to the BS!!!!! Ask me how I know on this. Whether AI or wik-I... the issue remains. From someone who ran computers back in the days of the great IBM "360" there was a saying we used back then that is still valid today with both wiki and AI: "Garbage in– garbage out."
Posted on: 3/27 15:26
|
|||
|