Merry Christmas and welcome to Packard Motor Car Information! If you're new here, please register for a free account.  
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!
FAQ's
Main Menu
Recent Forum Topics
Who is Online
67 user(s) are online (56 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 3
Guests: 64

kevinpackard, packardsix1939, Bob J, more...
Helping out...
PackardInfo is a free resource for Packard Owners that is completely supported by user donations. If you can help out, that would be great!

Donate via PayPal
Video Content
Visit PackardInfo.com YouTube Playlist

Donate via PayPal



« 1 (2) 3 »

Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#11
Home away from home
Home away from home

Pgh Ultramatic
See User information
55 and 56 but only the latter was negative ground.

Posted on: 10/1 16:39
1955 400 | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Deluxe | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Super Panama | Registry
Email (Parts/service inquiries only, please. Post all questions on the forum.)
service@ultramatic.info
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#12
Home away from home
Home away from home

Leeedy
See User information
Quote:

Cohocom wrote:
I'm currently in the process of restoring my 1956 Packard Executive. Back in 1988 I removed a complete dash based AC system from a 1955 Patrician parts car including the dash top & pad with the cut outs for the vents. Question is? How efficient is the stock set up & are there parts out there to rebuild the compressor & other associated components? Is it more trouble then its worth? Go vintage air? Has anyone figured out if it is doable to hide a modern compressor in the old housing? So... will I be cool or just look cool? Thanks!


Hello,

The 1955-56 Packard factory air conditioning system was very efficient and in some ways it was over-engineered. It was one of the industry's MOST advanced A/C systems. 1955-56 Packard A/C was wayyyy ahead of most of the industry with its theater style front-mounted units flowing rearward rather than rear-to front. Or top-down arrangements that could freeze bald heads while the rest of the customer was sweating.

You may want to note that 1955 and 1956 systems differed slightly, particularly in the hoses. The 1955 hoses had a braided covering while the 1956 hoses had no such covering.

But whether you plan on using freon R-12 or newer R-134 refrigerant, I still strongly suggest that you do R-134 grade hoses. The cost of R-12 alone (ask me how I know) and the hassle of finding it (actually illegal in some places) would all offset the cost of R-134-grade hoses.

RE: the original Lehigh V-4 compressor... These look lovely and are certainly original. But finding a working one and /or parts to repair one? OMG! There are a few out there still working today, but how long could Noah tread water? I have suggested that (like some people are doing with car batteries on vintage cars) 3-D modeling on a case facade that could be mounted over a Sanden compressor for display purposes is a possibility. Otherwise it is a matter of how deep are your pockets? How extensive are your parts resources?

IF you want your A/C system to actually work, then you may be looking at a reality of a modern Sanden cycling compressor. Even if temporary. And believe me, I am not at all a fan of modifications on Packards. And I don't put this in the category of "disc brakes" or nitrous.

Meanwhile... things always change, so hang onto your Lehigh compressor. Somebody MAY eventually have another re-build business.

Posted on: 10/2 14:59
 Top  Print   
Like (1)
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#13
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

Ozstatman
See User information
Cohocom, for including your '56 Executive Hardtop Coupe in the Registry.

Posted on: 10/5 14:58
Mal
/o[]o\
====

Bowral, Southern Highlands of NSW, Australia
"Out of chaos comes order" - Nietzsche.

1938 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

1941 One-Twenty Club Coupe - SOLD

1948 Super Eight Limo, chassis RHD - SOLD

1950 Eight Touring Sedan - SOLD

What's this?
Put your Packard in the Packard Vehicle Registry!
Here's how!
Any questions - PM or email me at ozstatman@gmail.com
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#14
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Pete '56
See User information
I'm in the process of adding a factory A/C system to my '56 Caribbean Hardtop. Have an original NOS Lehigh compressor and NOS clutch. Decided to go R134 as R12 is enormously expensive here in Southern California. What my A/C guy recommended is going with a cycling clutch as the original modulating would not work with the R134. We then gutted the modulating valve, so it just functions as a "pass" through, then added a module to cycle the clutch ala modern cars. Also, as mentioned in other posts, the original hoses, which I bought a few decades ago NOS, are not compatible with the R134. According to my A/C guy, the rest of the system should work fine with the R134. We will see in a few months how successful we are. Have heard stories that at idle or low RPM the Lehigh is not efficient and will not blow cold as modern systems. Any feedback on that issue? Thanks.

Posted on: 10/17 15:39
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#15
Forum Ambassador
Forum Ambassador

HH56
See User information
If you do use the Lehigh compressor, the original oil used with Freon R12 is said to be not compatible with R134a. Not sure of the extent of incompatibility but several professional AC sites say It is highly recommended the old compressor oil be drained and all components flushed a couple of times to rid the system of any traces of incompatible oil before new R134a safe oil is placed in the compressor and system. Several sites also recommend new filter/driers along with the new oil.

Posted on: 10/17 16:17
Howard
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#16
Home away from home
Home away from home

Pgh Ultramatic
See User information
In the owners manual it says that if you want the AC to blow cold at idle, you need to feather the gas a bit to raise the idle. It’s just how they were.

Posted on: 10/17 16:31
1955 400 | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Deluxe | Registry | Project Blog
1955 Clipper Super Panama | Registry
Email (Parts/service inquiries only, please. Post all questions on the forum.)
service@ultramatic.info
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#17
Home away from home
Home away from home

bkazmer
See User information
All the compatibility points are valid. Do not expect a system designed and sized for R12 to blow as cold with R134. Before its environmental downside was known, there were reasons R12 was the choice

Posted on: 10/17 17:32
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#18
Home away from home
Home away from home

Leeedy
See User information
Quote:

humanpotatohybrid wrote:
In the owners manual it says that if you want the AC to blow cold at idle, you need to feather the gas a bit to raise the idle. It’s just how they were.



Please. Air conditioning systems always cool less at idle and low speeds– especially in high ambient temperatures. "feathering the gas" merely serves to turn the fan faster... which in turn sucks more air across the condenser core... with the expected result. But this is not "just how they were" as if Packard V8s were somehow less or special primitive cases.

This is a universal procedure for ANY automobile with air conditioning. Right up to today. I can do the exact same procedure on my modern Lincoln and marginally boost A/C cooling. The only difference is that today most cars with advanced A/C systems equipped with R-134 also have a "recirc" setting that can help lower the air temp in the cabin (most people today have no idea how "recirc" works or even that it exists).

A cycling clutch on a Lehigh compressor is, of course, a good idea in today's world.

But remember, R-134 is less effective for cooling at idle, in heavy traffic and low speeds in hot weather. It can actually have worse cooling than an R-12 system. So let's not make the A/C system on V8 Packards sound lame. As I have said, it was one of the most advanced, best functioning factory air units in the industry at the time.

IF someone has a Lehigh compressor that is indeed functioning properly AND that person can obtain R-12, then by all means, the investment in R-12 is ginormous (and in some cases, illegal). But the investment is certainly worthwhile in light of the costs and technical issues of an entire changeover and related angsting. Lesser of two evils is still lesser– IF you want a functioning system. Old luxury cars are expensive... and the older they get and more complicated they are, the more expensive they get.

Posted on: 10/17 19:23
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#19
Home away from home
Home away from home

TxGoat
See User information
Compressor speed is low at idle, and engine fan speed is also low. Both of these conditions reduce A/C performance, and road draft is also lost. An auxiliary electric fan might be helpful in traffic, if it could move a LOT of air. At idle and low speeds on sunny days, the exterior of the car can get very hot, which further challenges the A/C. Setting the engine idle a little higher than normal will help cool things off at idle if you have a manual transmission. With an automatic, I'd stick with the factory spec on idle speed. Keeping everything as clean as is practical helps heat escape. Radiator, evaporator, and condenser need to be kept free of bugs, grass seed, dust, etc. and keeping the engine and transmission clean helps cooling. Keeping door and window seals in good condition will help, and any floor, firewall, roof, or or other insulation needs to be in place and in good condition.

Posted on: 10/17 19:41
 Top  Print   
 


Re: Stock Air conditioning in a 56 Packard V8. To do or not to do?
#20
Quite a regular
Quite a regular

Pete '56
See User information
I would have loved to keep my '56 Caribbean Hardtop an R12 car but R12 is $250 per pound, at one of the very few shops (1 or 2) that will deal with it, especially on a classic car. The Packard system is roughly 5 pounds so that is a total of $1,250 for just the freon. Add in roughly $400 for an NOS modulating valve, oil evacuation in the NOS compressor, new oil and the labor, you probably will be well over $2K just to get the thing up and blowing cold air. Pray it doesn't leak any time soon. I'm in Southern California where the restrictions are onerous. Given the cost of the R12 I concluded it was better to go R134 as it is $30 per pound.

Posted on: 10/18 18:36
 Top  Print   
 




« 1 (2) 3 »





- The following Google Ad-Sense Advert helps fund the cost of providing this free resource -
- Logged in users will not see these. Please Join and Donate to help support the website -
Search
Recent Photos
Photo of the Day
Recent Registry
Upcoming Events
Website Comments or Questions?? Click Here Copyright 2006-2024, PackardInfo.com All Rights Reserved